楼主: ReneeBK
2326 4

[问答] How can I compare regression coefficients in the same multiple regression model [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 62粉丝

VIP

已卖:4895份资源

学术权威

14%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

R资源总汇

Panel Data Analysis

Experimental Design

威望
1
论坛币
49629 个
通用积分
55.4465
学术水平
370 点
热心指数
273 点
信用等级
335 点
经验
57805 点
帖子
4005
精华
21
在线时间
582 小时
注册时间
2005-5-8
最后登录
2023-11-26

楼主
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-4-23 00:53:57 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

I think this question has been answered in bits and pieces here and there, but I am still a bit unsure about what the best approach for this is: how to compare two coefficients from a multiple linear regression to see if the effect strengths are significantly different.

For example, I am interested in relating attitude (IV1) and behavioral control (IV2) to the medication adherence (DV). I found that standardized betas were 0.30 and 0.19 for attitude and behavioral control, respectively. Is it reasonable to say the attitude is the strongest predictor of medication adherence? If so, how can I test whether its effect is significantly different from those of the other predictors? I am using SPSS v19.


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:coefficients coefficient regression regressio EFFICIENT multiple compare

沙发
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-4-23 00:54:41
  • Just about any decent regression text warns that trying to get at the separate effects of predictors is difficult if not impossible. They act as a team, pulling together or against each other. Comparing relative strength is completely straightforward only if the predictors (you say dependent variables) are uncorrelated.
  • You have done already the compariosn. Using standardized coefficients clearly adjusts for different measurement units and different variability. Beyond that what you seem to want is difficult to establish.




Nick Fox

藤椅
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-4-23 00:58:10
In econometrics there's a concept of economic significance. In a nutshell it's a product of beta and the standard error of the variable. You compare these products.

You are already doing this. In a model y=Xβ+ε, the economic significance of a variable xi is std[xi]⋅βi. This product has the same unit of measure as y. The meaning is that one standard deviation of the variable causes this much change in y. There is no statistical test here to compare them. Since independent variables are correlated, you can't simply add up the significances to the total variance of y. So this economic significance metric is sort of qualitative.

板凳
spoonshen 发表于 2014-4-24 01:59:03
z-test.

报纸
kkwei 发表于 2014-4-24 03:31:18
wald test

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注cda
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-5 18:43