楼主: ldhyy_ok
5187 6

[资料] [求助]高手帮忙分析一下hausman检验的结果 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:223份资源

博士生

50%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
252 个
通用积分
0.1200
学术水平
1 点
热心指数
1 点
信用等级
1 点
经验
1098 点
帖子
103
精华
0
在线时间
446 小时
注册时间
2007-7-23
最后登录
2023-12-10

楼主
ldhyy_ok 发表于 2008-3-30 12:56:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
<p>Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test    <br/>Pool: POOL01    <br/>Test cross-section and period random effects    <br/>    <br/>Test Summary  Chi-Sq. Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob. <br/>    <br/>Cross-section random  3.084449   1       0.0790<br/>Period random  0.315413               1                  0.5744<br/>Cross-section and period random  3.482205    1          0.0620<br/>    <br/>    <br/>Cross-section random effects test comparisons:    <br/>    <br/>Variable Fixed   Random  Var(Diff.)  Prob. <br/>    <br/>S?       -0.193918             -0.013138              0.010596              0.0790<br/>    <br/>    <br/>Cross-section random effects test equation:    <br/>Dependent Variable: GY?    <br/>Method: Panel EGLS (Period random effects)    <br/>Date: 03/30/08   Time: 12:56    <br/>Sample: 1989 2005    <br/>Included observations: 17    <br/>Cross-sections included: 72    <br/>Total pool (balanced) observations: 1224    <br/>Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances    <br/>    <br/>Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  <br/>    <br/>C 0.256381 0.064393 3.981478                0.0001<br/>S? -0.193918 0.119061 -1.628731            0.1036<br/>    <br/> Effects Specification   <br/>   S.D.   Rho  <br/>    <br/>Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)    <br/>Period random   0.064672 0.0692<br/>Idiosyncratic random   0.237209 0.9308<br/>    <br/> Weighted Statistics   <br/>    <br/>R-squared 0.060808     Mean dependent var  0.152084<br/>Adjusted R-squared 0.002058     S.D. dependent var  0.237409<br/>S.E. of regression 0.237165     Sum squared resid  64.74050<br/>F-statistic 1.035029     Durbin-Watson stat  2.217587<br/>Prob(F-statistic) 0.400608   <br/>    <br/> Unweighted Statistics   <br/>    <br/>R-squared 0.055692     Mean dependent var  0.152084<br/>Sum squared resid 69.42466     Durbin-Watson stat  2.125597<br/>    <br/>    <br/>Period random effects test comparisons:    <br/>    <br/>Variable Fixed   Random  Var(Diff.)  Prob. <br/>    <br/>S? -0.015579 -0.013138 0.000019 0.5744<br/>    <br/>    <br/>Period random effects test equation:    <br/>Dependent Variable: GY?    <br/>Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section random effects)    <br/>Date: 03/30/08   Time: 12:56    <br/>Sample: 1989 2005    <br/>Included observations: 17    <br/>Cross-sections included: 72    <br/>Total pool (balanced) observations: 1224    <br/>Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances    <br/>    <br/>Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  <br/>    <br/>C 0.160463 0.032970 4.866967 0.0000<br/>S? -0.015579 0.059990 -0.259684 0.7952<br/>    <br/> Effects Specification   <br/>   S.D.   Rho  <br/>    <br/>Cross-section random   0.008000 0.0011<br/>Period fixed (dummy variables)    <br/>Idiosyncratic random   0.237209 0.9989<br/>    <br/> Weighted Statistics   <br/>    <br/>R-squared 0.074178     Mean dependent var  0.152084<br/>Adjusted R-squared 0.061127     S.D. dependent var  0.245053<br/>S.E. of regression 0.237445     Sum squared resid  67.99460<br/>F-statistic 5.683884     Durbin-Watson stat  2.099954<br/>Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000   <br/>    <br/> Unweighted Statistics   <br/>    <br/>R-squared 0.074095     Mean dependent var  0.152084<br/>Sum squared resid 68.07168     Durbin-Watson stat  2.097576<br/>    <br/>    <br/>Cross-section and period random effects test comparisons:    <br/>    <br/>Variable Fixed   Random  Var(Diff.)  Prob. <br/>    <br/>S? -0.208638 -0.013138 0.010976 0.0620<br/>    <br/>    <br/>Cross-section and period random effects test equation:    <br/>Dependent Variable: GY?    <br/>Method: Panel Least Squares    <br/>Date: 03/30/08   Time: 12:56    <br/>Sample: 1989 2005    <br/>Included observations: 17    <br/>Cross-sections included: 72    <br/>Total pool (balanced) observations: 1224    <br/>    <br/>Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.  <br/>    <br/>C 0.264297 0.065242 4.051036 0.0001<br/>S? -0.208638 0.120647 -1.729319 0.0840<br/>    <br/> Effects Specification   <br/>    <br/>Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)    <br/>Period fixed (dummy variables)    <br/>    <br/>R-squared 0.131322     Mean dependent var  0.152084<br/>Adjusted R-squared 0.063971     S.D. dependent var  0.245181<br/>S.E. of regression 0.237209     Akaike info criterion  0.030185<br/>Sum squared resid 63.86441     Schwarz criterion  0.401736<br/>Log likelihood 70.52693     F-statistic  1.949807<br/>Durbin-Watson stat 2.236413     Prob(F-statistic)  0.000001<br/>    <br/>    <br/></p>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Hausman检验 hausman ausman SMA Man

沙发
melodygd 发表于 2008-3-30 23:50:00

好像主要看第一段卡方检验结果,如果拒绝,则表示应该用随机效应

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test   
Pool: POOL01   
Test cross-section and period random effects    
Test Summary  Chi-Sq. Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.  
Cross-section random  3.084449   1       0.0790
Period random  0.315413               1                  0.5744
Cross-section and period random  3.482205    1          0.0620

从你的这段结果中的prob来看,均>0.05,说明在0.05水平下接受,应该用固定效应模型。

不知道对不对?仅供参考

藤椅
kangaroo01 发表于 2008-4-1 12:47:00

p值0.0790>0.05
拒绝原假设,所以应该用固定效应模型比较合适。

板凳
sminy 发表于 2011-6-16 13:20:20
楼上两位说反了吧 P值大于0.05 说明接受原假设 即接受随机效应 应该用随机效应模型

报纸
kevinion 发表于 2011-6-21 10:19:29
接受随机效应!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

地板
yinsixia 发表于 2011-7-17 20:51:24
我也觉得是随机效应模型呀

7
hxp3582 发表于 2015-10-24 14:42:10
前两位说错了。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-30 04:24