楼主: 招商证券686
842 0

[英文文献] Cultural Heritage Valuation in African Commonwealth Countries: An Examinati... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-21
最后登录
2020-9-21

楼主
招商证券686 发表于 2005-7-7 12:21:12 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Cultural Heritage Valuation in African Commonwealth Countries: An Examination of Methodological Issues
英文文献作者:Adebayo Ogunba,Olusegun Adegunle
英文文献摘要:
Purpose: Conventional valuation methodology has proved inadequate to capture cultural heritage value in African Commonwealth countries. The paper addressed grey valuation methodology issues in Nigeria, which was presented as a case study of an African country facing unresolved methodology. The paper identified and examined cultural heritage property types compulsorily acquired in Delta State, Nigeria between 2002 and 2011, identified the diverse compensation valuation methodology adopted by valuers, examined the factors that influenced methodology and investigated stakeholders’ perceptions of the compensation adequacy. This was with a view to providing guiding principles for appropriate compensation valuation of African heritage properties.Design/methods: Primary data were collected through field observations of acquired heritage sites as well as three sets of questionnaire administered on community heads of eight identified expropriated communities, all the thirty-three registered firms of valuation surveyors in the study area and directors of the public acquiring agencies in Delta State. Findings: The study identified 33 shrines, 5 cemeteries, 3.traditional forests, 2 historical buildings, 1 sacred grove, 1 battleground and 1 palace which were compulsorily acquired and subsequently valued for compulsory acquisition in the 8 communities. The major heads of claim employed in their valuations were the value of unexhausted improvements, resettlement costs and cultural expenses. The valuation techniques adopted were direct comparison, cost of resettlement and contingent valuation. Major factors that influenced the choice of heads of claim were valuer conservatism (a resort to conventional heads), government bias for resettlement and the demand of claimants for compensation for disturbance of sacred property. Significant variation was observed between the expectations of the stakeholders on cultural valuation methodology and valuation practice. The study concluded that valuers’ approaches to cultural heritage property valuation in the study area require wider valuation basis and scope of heads of claim.Practical implications: The paper clarifies grey areas that exist in Nigerian heritage valuation methodology and provides information needed for reviews of the valuation components of compensation laws. Originality/Value: This paper addresses practical methodological problems experienced in the valuation of heritage property in in African Commonwealth countries."
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-18 16:15