英文文献:A Survey on the Washington Consensus and the Beijing Model: Reconciling Development Perspectives-《华盛顿共识与北京模式:协调发展视角
英文文献作者:Simplice A. Asongu,Paul N. Acha-Anyi
英文文献摘要:
Reconciling the two dominant development models of the Washington Consensus (WC) and Beijing Model (BM) remains a critical challenge in the literature. The challenge is even more demanding when emerging development paradigms like the Liberal Institutional Pluralism (LIP) and New Structural Economics (NSE) schools have to be integrated. While the latter has recognized both State and market failures but failed to provide a unified theory, the former has left the challenging concern of how institutional diversity matter in the development process. We synthesize perspectives from recently published papers on development and Sino-African relations in order to present the relevance of both the WC and BM in the long-term and short-run respectively. While the paper postulates for a unified theory by reconciling the WC and the BM to complement the NSE, it at the same time presents a case for economic rights and political rights as short-run and long-run development priorities respectively. By attempting to reconcile the WC with the BM, the study contributes at the same to macroeconomic NSE literature of unifying a development theory and to the LIP literature on institutional preferences with stages of development. Hence, the proposed reconciliation takes into account the structural and institutional realities of nations at different stages of the process of development.
调和华盛顿共识(WC)和北京模式(BM)这两种主要的发展模式仍然是文献中一个关键的挑战。当自由主义制度多元化(LIP)和新结构经济学(NSE)等新兴发展范式需要整合时,挑战就更大了。后者承认了国家和市场的失败,但未能提供一个统一的理论,前者则留下了一个具有挑战性的问题,即制度多样性如何影响发展过程。我们从最近发表的有关发展与中非关系的论文中,综合了一些观点,以便分别从长期和短期的角度来展示WC和BM的相关性。虽然本文希望通过协调WC和BM来补充NSE,从而实现理论的统一,但同时也提出了经济权利和政治权利分别作为短期和长期发展重点的案例。通过试图调和WC和BM,本研究有助于统一发展理论的宏观经济学NSE文献和关于发展阶段制度偏好的LIP文献。因此,拟议的和解考虑到处于发展进程不同阶段的各国的结构和体制现实。