楼主: li0265
4989 7

政府干预自由市场的问题 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

学前班

80%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
30 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
70 点
帖子
2
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2008-8-31
最后登录
2008-8-31

楼主
li0265 发表于 2008-8-31 20:15:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
一个作业题,请大家帮忙解释:为什么社会虽然强烈认同自由市场,但政府干预自由市场仍是必须的。 谢谢大家(原文是Explain the reasons why, even in societies that believe strongly in free markets, government intervention in the market is regarded as a necessity.)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:政府干预 intervention GOVERNMENT Societies Believe 政府 自由市场

沙发
lishitang 发表于 2008-9-1 16:28:00

自由市场优点:自由竞争、资源配置的高效性……选择市场自由经济运行模式是分工的的扩大、商品经济发展的必然选择;

但是自由市场经济这只看不见的手也存在着许多问题(市场失灵)

比如信息不完全、垄断、外部经济、公共产品搭便车等一系列问题。因此,在此需引入政府干预这只看得见的手,把看见的手和看不见的结合起来。共同促进自由市场经济的协调、健康发展。

藤椅
zhangfeijun 发表于 2008-9-1 19:14:00
政府干预经济运行是否多此一举,画蛇添足呢?其实不然,市场也有失效的时候,因其本身存在着缺陷,如竞争的无序,垄断...阻碍了经济的健康发展,竞争的无序会扰乱市场,降低市场对资源的优化配置能力,垄断容易使垄断性的企业谋取高额的暴利,损害消费者的利益,同时,垄断企业也会阻止同行业或是相关行业的企业的发展,因垄断本身的竞争优势,使其在此行业上能操纵市场,扩大其利润空间,所以这些不合理不规范的缺陷需要政府来弥补,来调节市场,这样才能更有效的发挥市场的作用,促进经济平稳,健康的向前发展.
   所以自由市场和政府敢于两者缺一不可,相互取长补短,如何协调两者的关系,发挥最大的整体绩效,是摆在我们面前的重要问题.

板凳
fishing_boy 在职认证  发表于 2008-9-1 20:37:00

 沒錯 同意楼上看法

有市场失灵 也有政府失灵

这些是大 issue

报纸
lyl199850954 发表于 2008-9-2 20:58:00

政府不停干预,市场就不能健全,例如股票市场,动不动就政府救市,什么分析家凡是遇到股市熊市,就不停鼓励政府救市,股市本来就不是那些没有承受能力的人玩的游戏,现在全民皆股,不能说与政府干预无关

天真--只因为天生如此。无邪--只因始终如一。

地板
Quaikie 发表于 2008-9-5 13:17:00
xplain the reasons why, even in societies that believe strongly in free markets, government intervention in the market is regarded as a necessity.??

Because government is greedy. They look for as many as ways to extend their functions. At the beginning, their job is just security. And they start to build "public goods" in order to kick out of the private companies to monopolize the market for money. And they even abandon the gold standard to print money as they want.

7
Quaikie 发表于 2008-9-5 13:21:00
以下是引用zhangfeijun在2008-9-1 19:14:00的发言:
政府干预经济运行是否多此一举,画蛇添足呢?其实不然,市场也有失效的时候,因其本身存在着缺陷,如竞争的无序,垄断...阻碍了经济的健康发展,竞争的无序会扰乱市场,降低市场对资源的优化配置能力,垄断容易使垄断性的企业谋取高额的暴利,损害消费者的利益,同时,垄断企业也会阻止同行业或是相关行业的企业的发展,因垄断本身的竞争优势,使其在此行业上能操纵市场,扩大其利润空间,所以这些不合理不规范的缺陷需要政府来弥补,来调节市场,这样才能更有效的发挥市场的作用,促进经济平稳,健康的向前发展.
   所以自由市场和政府敢于两者缺一不可,相互取长补短,如何协调两者的关系,发挥最大的整体绩效,是摆在我们面前的重要问题.

本来不存在市场失效,市场失效其实是政府干预造成的

看看这个:

Externalities

Conventional economics teaches that if the benefits or costs of one person's economic decisions spill over onto others, an externality exists, and it ought to be corrected by the government through redistribution. But, broadly defined, externalities are inherent in every economic transaction because costs and benefits are ultimately subjective. I may be delighted to see factories belching smoke because I love industry. But that does not mean I should be taxed for the privilege of viewing them. Similarly, I may be offended that most men don't have beards, but that doesn't mean that the clean-shaven ought to be taxed to compensate me for my displeasure.

Murray Rothbard

The Austrian School redefines externalities as occurring only with physical invasions of property, as when my neighbor dumps his trash in my yard. Then the issue becomes crime. There can be no value-free adding-up of utilities to determine subjective costs or benefits of economic activity. Instead, the relevant criterion should be whether economic actions occur in a peaceful manner.

Another area where Austrians differ is how the government is supposed to go about the practical problem of correcting for market failures. Grant that somehow the government can spot a market failure, the burden of proof is still on the government to demonstrate that it can perform the task more efficiently than the market. Austrians would refocus the energy that goes into finding market failures to understanding more about government failures.

But the failure of government to do what mainstream theory says it can is not a popular subject. Outside of the Public Choice schools, it is usually assumed that the government is capable of doing anything it wants to do, and of doing it well. Forgotten is the nature of the state as an institution with its own pernicious designs on society. One of the contributions of Rothbard was to focus Austrians on this point, and on the likely patterns interventions will take. He developed a typology of interventionism, and provided detailed critiques of many kinds of interventions and their consequences.

8
uc_sjtu 在职认证  发表于 2008-9-5 18:23:00

楼上的奥地利学派的观点很精辟,但是我觉得作为政府或多或少都是反市场的,因为市场完美意味着政府在经济领域要放弃权利,而放弃权利是一件太难的事情,中外皆然

"我看到,历史不是根据实际发生的事件写就,内战史最终写成党派斗争史,一部谎言的历史。谎言最终成

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 19:13