楼主: 老鱼父
13533 85

[财经时事] [转帖]佩佐夫的惊世预言—中国的大萧条 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

学科带头人

31%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
1
论坛币
15610 个
通用积分
0.4815
学术水平
53 点
热心指数
99 点
信用等级
23 点
经验
15312 点
帖子
1152
精华
1
在线时间
872 小时
注册时间
2008-8-1
最后登录
2012-11-18

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
作者克拉斯穆尔·佩佐夫,出生于保加利亚,现于从事研究于美国阿拉巴马州奥地利经济学米塞斯研究院。  文章来源: 全球财经观察

最近读完Rothbard的《美国的大萧条》(America’s Great Depression)一书后,我忍不住将美国喧嚣的20年代与今天中国火热的经济进行比较,并且不得不得出如下结论:中国将不可避免地陷入一次大萧条,如同美国在20世纪30年代所经历的。本文的目的在于表明一种奥地利学派的观点——为什么大萧条会发生。为证实我的看法,我将在适当之处引用 Rothbard的著作(第五版) 。

在开始之前,我建议所有没有读过Rothbard《美国的大萧条》一书的读者都把这本书拿过来读一下。首先,这会是一次令人愉快的阅读,Rothbard的机智写作风格使得阅读这本书充满趣味。其次,该书的第一部分发展了奥地利学派的商业周期理论,该理论对于理解信贷繁荣及之后不可避免的泡沫崩溃是不可或缺的。最后,该书的第二部分详细阐释了1920年代通货膨胀繁荣(Inflationary Boom)的出现和原因,提出了一个将之与今天中国经济政策比较的基础。

为着手进行我们的比较,我们需要以历史的眼光来检阅一个世界超级强权和一个正在崛起的经济巨人之间的关系。在20世纪20年代,大不列颠是世界的超级强权,美国是正在崛起的巨人。于是,大不列颠独立地施行其经济政策,而美国以多少有些从属的形式调整它自己的政策。今天,美国是这个世界支配性的强权,中国是正在崛起的经济巨人。因此很自然的,美国独立地施展政策,而中国相应地调整其自身。

继续我们的比较分析,20世纪20年代不列颠帝国已经在衰落,军事上过度扩张,而为了给帝国的冒险埋单,不列颠求诸于货币贬值和持续的外贸和预算赤字政策。换言之,不列颠是一个储蓄不足、净负债的国家,而其他国家为其提供融资。而此时的美国贸易盈余,是一个净债权国。回过头来看,重要的一点是,当其他国家拧紧借贷的水龙头,并开始把资本抽返回国内时,不列颠帝国崩溃了。如今,美利坚帝国正在衰落,军事上过度扩张,并且以“经过历史检验的”(tried-and-true)货币贬值和无尽头的外贸和预算赤字方法来资助它过度扩张的帝国。换言之,美国是储蓄消耗殆尽的(savings-starved)的净债务国,而其他国家正在为其融资。同时,今天的中国贸易盈余,是一个净债权国。当其他的国家最终关闭对美国信贷的水龙头时,美利坚帝国也会崩溃吗?

根据Rothbard解释,大萧条的出现是因为繁荣建立在信贷扩张的基础上。Rothbard指出,“整个繁荣期内,我们看到货币供应增加了280亿美元,8年间(1921-1929)增加了61.8%。这等于每年平均7.7%的增长,通货膨胀幅度非常显著(93页)……整个货币扩张以信贷制造的产品——货币替代品的形式出现……20年代产生通货膨胀的主要因素是全部银行储备的增加。(102页)”换言之,20年代,美国经历了一次通货膨胀性信贷繁荣。这在繁荣的股市和房地产市场特别明显。此外,还出现了“对外国债券的投机高潮……这是直接反映了美国的信贷扩张,尤其是由信贷扩张产生的低利率。(130页)”为抑制繁荣,美联储徒劳地尝试向市场进行道德劝说,将信贷扩张仅限制于“合法的生意”。重要的是,消费价格通常保持平衡,甚至在这一时期时略微下降”(86页)。毫无疑问,稳定的消费价格让人们觉得经济大体稳定,大部分的专业经济人士因而并没有意识到,经济本质上并不健康。对他们来说,泡沫破裂来得很意外。

现在,以一种类似的形式,萧条的种子在中国种下了。经济学者欢呼中国的增长,许多人没有意识到中国正在经历一次通货膨胀性信贷扩张(inflationary credit boom),其规模让美国喧嚣的20年代相形见绌。根据官方的数据统计,2002年中国GDP增长8%,2003年的增长是8.5%,一些分析师相信这些数字是保守的。根据中国人民银行的网站,2001年一季度“货币及准货币供应”是11.89万亿元,2002年一季度是15.96万亿元,2003年一季度是19.05万亿元,而2004年一季度是22.51万亿元。换言之,2001、2002和2003货币供应增长分别为34.2%、19.3%和 18.1%。因此,在过去三年间,中国的货币供应增长速度大约是美国在20年代的三倍。

这样,中国股市一路繁荣,房地产市场更如火如荼,也就不奇怪了。就像美国在20年代一样,中国以贸易盈余的美元购买美国的政府债券,为外国——主要是美国提供融资。一如美联储在20年代道德劝说的努力以破灭告终,中国政府今天也进行类似徒劳的尝试,希望通过把信贷投向那些需要的产业——即通常由于政治原因获得政府支持的产业,来遏制信贷的增长。而且,在当下繁荣的大部分阶段,中国的消费物价大多平稳甚至下降,而原材料产品的价格猛然上涨,这一点十分符合奥地利派的看法,高端产品——比如原材料——的价格相对于低端产品——比如消费品——的价格上升。这真的表明,信贷扩张已经进行了相当一段时间,而通货膨胀处于高级阶段,尽管现在还没有达到一种失控的状况。因此,中国今天的经济条件与美国的20年代令人瞩目的相似,而多年的信贷扩张预示着泡沫破灭在所难免。

在货币和出口政策方面的类似同样重要。20年代,英镑被高估,而且被小的国家用作储备货币。当不列颠在20年代执行通货膨胀政策,该国在向其它国家输出(lose)黄金,主要是美国。所以,“如果美国政府要使美国货币膨胀,大不列颠将不再向美国输出黄金(143页)。”使这一问题加剧的是,美国有意地刺激对外贷款(foreign lending),这进一步加强了美国农场的出口,加剧了净出口的问题,并且加速了黄金流动的不平衡。“这(对外贷款)还使得美国的贸易没有建立在一个互惠和有益交换的稳固基础上,而是基于一种狂热的——后来被证明为不健康的——贷款刺激(promotion of loans)(139页)。“胡佛(总统)对于补贴对外贷款如此热心,以至他后来表示即使坏账也促进了美国出口,因而是一种提供救济和就业的便宜手段—— 这种便宜手段后来导致代价昂贵的赖账和金融灾难(141页)。”因此,下面的讨论将清楚表明,美国通货膨胀政策背后的根本原因是:(1)抑制大不列颠对美国的黄金流出(2) 刺激对外贷款,以及(3)有意刺激出口。

类似的,今天美元被高估,被用作世界的储备货币。美国执行其通货膨胀政策,正在向其它各国输出美元,主要是中国(和日本)。今天,中国的货币和出口政策与它的钉住美元政策挂钩。这样做的主要动机是,通过有意低估自己的货币,从而高估美元,中国人为地刺激其制造业出口。第二个动机是,通过买入过多的美元,并再投资于美国政策债券,中国充当了美国的对外借贷人。第三个动机,是这种对外借贷刺激美国对中国制造业出口的需求,使中国政府得以缓解其当下的失业问题。换言之,中国货币和出口政策背后的动机与美国在20年代时的一样:(1)支持高估的美元,(2)刺激对外贷款,(3)刺激自己的制造业出口。就像美国在20年代,中国的贸易不是建立在互惠和有益交换的基础上,而是在对外贷款的基础上。毫无疑问,大部分贷款将变得成本非常高,因为贷款将被以大大贬值了的美元偿还,这反过来将加剧中国银行业日益积累的金融灾难。

因此,很清楚,中国今天在滑向萧条的道路上。这次萧条的严重程度会如何,将关键取决于两方面的进展:首先,中国政府将在多长时间内追求通货膨胀的政策,第二,中国政府与泡沫破灭搏斗的顽强程度。通货膨胀扩展得越长,与破灭搏斗得越顽强,中国的萧条就越可能变成一次大萧条。还有,意识到美国在30年代的大萧条引发了世界范围的萧条是重要的,类似的,中国的萧条将引发美国的泡沫破灭,进而引发其它国家的衰退。

除非提前出现一场没有被预测到的波及全世界的银行、货币或者衍生产品危机,我确信,中国的泡沫破灭将会在2008年-2009年间某个时刻发生,因为一直到2008年奥林匹克运动会在中国举办前,中国政府将肯定会继续追求一种刺激经济的政策。到那时,通货膨胀将非常可能无法控制,可能现在已经处于失控的状况,而政府除了急踩刹车和采取收缩外毫无选择。1929年,(美国)扩张在7月份停止,股市在10月份崩溃,经济在1930年崩溃。因此,考虑到在信贷收缩与经济崩溃之间有大约半年的延宕期,基于我的奥运会时间点,我将崩溃确定在2009年。无可否认,这纯粹是我的猜测;自然的,崩溃可能更早或更晚发生。

尽管我把时间点定在2008年奥运会,但是Marc Faber相信,崩溃将更早发生。根据他的看法,美国将遇到一场实质性(meaningful)的衰退,这反过来将加剧在中国已经存在的制造业过剩。加上不断恶化的信贷问题,他认为中国将会在奥运会之前陷入衰退。换言之,Faber博士认为,一场美国衰退将会引发中国的萧条。的确,这非常可能是一个引发点,但即便如此,人们还需要观察中国政府让泡沫自行破灭,还是选择一条“粉身碎骨”的繁荣之路——不惜任何代价。

我们应该还要考虑另一个可能的崩溃引发点,即由于中国必须进口的资源,比如矿产品价格加速上涨,令贸易盈余变成贸易赤字。面对贸易赤字,中国可能决定通过出售美国政府债券来沽出盈余,或者中国可能抛弃钉住美元。两种情况都将令染恙在身的美国经济更形恶化,并反过来打击中国。

最后,崩溃可能由一场世界原油供应危机引发。石油供应如果不是已经下降的话,也已经接近临界点,而中东或者里海的局势不清将令石油供应急剧削减。从历史上看,石油短缺和伴随而来的石油价格上升总是引起衰退。如果石油危机发生,对石油日益增长的依赖将令中国无可避免地滑向衰退。

总而言之,以下几种情形可能会成为中国萧条的触发点:(1)一场世界范围的货币、银行或者衍生产品危机,(2)美国的一次衰退,(3)扼制通货膨胀的措施,(4)中国失去贸易盈余,还有,(5)一场石油供应危机。

不管是什么引发中国崩溃,都无疑将揭开一场全球范围衰退的序幕。正如美国从大萧条中脱身而成世界无敌的超级强权,中国也很有可能浴火而出,成为新的超级国家。 文章来源: 全球财经观察

猫爪  魅力 +10  您的帖子标题越来越吸引人啦:) 2008-10-17 16:12:45
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:大萧条 佩佐夫 inflationary Meaningful Depression 预言 萧条 佩佐夫

沧浪之水清兮可以濯我缨,沧浪之水浊兮可以濯我足。
沙发
老鱼父 发表于 2008-10-17 05:38:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

香港文汇报北京新闻中心记者海岩16日电/

起源于美国的金融风暴对中国的影响已不可避免,专家估计,中国GDP增速恐很快会降至8%这一「心理底线」,CPI亦可能明显下降甚至出现通缩。国家发改委副主任杜鹰16日表示,下半年以来中国经济出现的下行趋势已引起国务院高度关注,中央正在研究并准备出台一系列应对措施。专家表示,中国宏调政策已全面转向「保增长」,未来政府出台刺激内需、保护出口的财税措施应在意料之中,货币政策亦料适度放鬆。(

前财政部长项怀诚近日警告,受全球金融危机冲击,中国未来几个月乃至相当长时间裡可能面临经济减速、出口减少、财政收入下降、外汇储备缩水以及待业人员增加等一系列问题。

(10季度双位增幅或告终(

目前,金融危机正向实体经济蔓延,并初步显露出演变为经济危机的徵兆。随着欧美国家消费需求的大幅放缓,作为长期以来拉动中国经济的「三驾马车」之一的出口势必出现下滑。(

摩根大通首席经济学家龚方雄测算,如果中国出口增速从20%以上降低到个位数,经济增速就可能从12%变为8%到9%。而8%正是官方及学者对中国经济增速共同的「心理底线」。(「中国经济增速或许不能低于9%,因为要维持8%到9%的增长率,才能像发达国家0%的成长一样;否则中国根本就没有办法吸收这麽多劳动力进城」。而改革开放30年来,中国GDP年平均增速为9.8%。

另据路透社消息,已有分析师预计,三季度中国经济增速可能回落至10%以下,从而结束06年初以来连续10个季度的两位数增长。(

根据以往经济危机的历史经验,紧随GDP下滑出现的将是CPI的明显下降。中国改革基金会国民经济研究所副所长王小鲁指出,在1997年香港金融危机爆发后的几年内,中国的CPI数据纷纷随经济减速而呈现负增长。其中1998年CPI指数为- 0.8%,1999年CPI指数更是下滑至-1.4%

如果CPI持续下降甚至出现通缩,将意味着企业盈利转差,员工工资收入止步不前。更有甚者,企业倒闭,员工失业。(

对于目前的经济形势,杜鹰表示,目前中国沿海地区的外贸进出口、工业企业的增长速度、工业企业增加值以及工业效益均出现了下行趋势。「这个冲击不可小视,不可轻视,影响可能还没有完全显现出来,要充分估计带来的困难和挑战,但要坚信战胜了这次的危机挑战以后,中国经济会上一个新的台阶。

(扩内需期「勐药」年内料再减息(

就在国家发改委副主任杜鹰透露「国务院正在研究并准备出台一系列应对金融风暴措施」的当天,外交部发言人秦刚16日亦在例行记者会上表示,中方密切关注当前国际金融危机对各国,包括对亚洲国家所带来的影响,并希望同其他国家,包括本地区有关国家,一道来共同克服目前面临的困难局面,应对这场金融危机。(

中国央行行长周小川日前在接受採访时也表示,由于受诸多因素的冲击,政府目前需要採取更多更有效的措施来刺激内需。(

内地专家认为,在当前经济下滑的背景下,宏调正面临结构转型和刺激经济增长的双重任务,货币政策料进一步放鬆,年内存贷款利率有可能再次下调27个基点。(

至于财政政策,下半年尤其是7月份的月度数据发佈之后,财政部已经出台了多项支持中小企业发展的政策,包括有针对性地进行融资补贴、产业转型补贴、税费减免等。未来几月内,扶植出口、刺激内需的金融财政政策料将陆续出台。此外,被寄予厚望的增值税转型改革方桉已上报国务院,极有可能获得批准并从明年初开始实施。

沧浪之水清兮可以濯我缨,沧浪之水浊兮可以濯我足。

使用道具

藤椅
cdy210007530862 发表于 2008-10-17 06:53:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
美国的双赤字 中国的高投资、出口和低消费都是需要改革的 否则都是不可持续的

使用道具

板凳
xl0212 发表于 2008-10-17 09:32:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/petrov/2004/0902.html

这应该佩佐夫的原文吧

好像链接速度比较慢,我把它拷贝过来,放在10楼了。

非常感谢各位及时提供原文的朋友,今后一律以此为例,论坛币+魅力送上。

我曾经看过这篇文章,他对中国的“萧条”和美国的“衰退”的预见有一定见地,

但是我们要注意,佩佐夫的这篇文章对中国泡沫的原因对比以及中国生产需求的分析并不充分。

其实在国外媒体上,这样的预言还很多,可以说,任何危机都有人曾经预言。

请理性对待。

——猫爪编辑

[此贴子已经被猫爪于2008-10-17 16:09:42编辑过]


猫爪  金钱 +30  魅力 +5  感谢您及时的原文 2008-10-17 15:58:51

使用道具

报纸
老鱼父 发表于 2008-10-17 10:14:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
以下是引用xl0212在2008-10-17 9:32:00的发言:

http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/petrov/2004/0902.html

这应该佩佐夫的原文吧

Thanks xl0212.

It is the English original copy!. Good Job !

沧浪之水清兮可以濯我缨,沧浪之水浊兮可以濯我足。

使用道具

地板
whx1785 发表于 2008-10-17 10:18:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

好贴。谢谢楼主了

使用道具

7
cdy210007530862 发表于 2008-10-17 10:20:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
看看兰德的2005年关于中国的报告就知道 中国的问题在于2020年时的建立在庞大基数上的人口老龄化问题 这个问题决定了中国不可能成为所谓的超级强国

使用道具

8
anmi 发表于 2008-10-17 11:21:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
好文阿!这么多年以来我第一次顶的好文!一些预言已经实现,剩下的就让我们拭目以待了!

使用道具

9
okmasha 发表于 2008-10-17 14:19:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
长了见识了,谢谢。

使用道具

10
猫爪 发表于 2008-10-17 15:41:00 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

CHINA'S GREAT DEPRESSION
by Krassimir Petrov, Ph.D.
September 2, 2004


Having recently completed Rothbard’s “America’s Great Depression”, I couldn’t help draw the parallels between America’s roaring 20’s and China’s roaring economy today, and I couldn’t help conclude that China will inevitably fall in a depression just like America did during the 1930s. The objective of this article is to present an Austrian argument as to why this must happen; to substantiate my arguments, I will be quoting Rothbard’s Fifth Edition where relevant.

Book CoverBefore proceeding any further, I would urge all readers who haven’t read Rothbard’s “America’s Great Depression”, to pick up a copy and read it. First, it is a real pleasant read, and Rothbard’s witty style of writing makes reading it fun. Second, the first part of the book develops the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, which is indispensable for understanding credit booms and their inevitable busts. Finally, the second part of the book elaborates the development and the causes of the Inflationary Boom of the 1920s and provides a basis for comparison with the economic policies of modern-day China.

In order to establish our parallel, we need some historical perspective of the relationship between a world superpower and a rising economic giant. In the 1920s, Great Britain was the superpower of the world, and the United States was the rising giant. As such, Great Britain ran its economic policies independently, and the U.S. adapted its own policies in a somewhat subordinated manner. Today, The United States is the hegemonic superpower of the world, and China is the rising economic giant. Not surprisingly, the U.S. runs its policy independently, while China adjusts its own accordingly.

Continuing our parallel analysis, during the 1920s the British Empire was already in decline, was militarily overextended, and in order to pay for its imperial adventures, resorted to debasing its own currency and running continuous foreign trade and budget deficits. In other words, Britain was savings-short, a net-debtor nation, and the rest of the world was financing her. Meanwhile, America was running trade surpluses and was a net creditor nation. Importantly from a historical point of view, the British Empire collapsed when the rest of the world pulled the plug on their credit and began capital repatriation. Today, the American Empire is in decline, is militarily overextended, and is financing her overextended empire with the “tried-and-true” methods of currency debasement and never-ending foreign trade and budget deficits. In other words, America is savings-starved, a net-debtor nation, and the rest of the world is financing her. At the same time, today China runs trade surpluses and is a net-creditor nation. When the rest of the world finally pulls the plug on American credit, will the American Empire also collapse?

The cause of the Depression, as Rothbard explains, was a credit expansion that fuelled the boom. According to Rothbard, “[o]ver the entire period of the boom, we find that the money supply increased by $28.0 billion, a 61.8 percent increase over the eight year period [of 1921-1929]. This was an average annual increase of 7.7 percent, a very sizable degree of inflation (p.93)…The entire monetary expansion took place in money substitutes, which are products of credit creation… The prime factor in generating the inflation of the 1920s was the increase in total bank reserves” (p.102). In other words, during the 1920s, the United States experienced an inflationary credit boom. This was most evident in the booming stock and the booming real estate markets. Furthermore, there was a “spectacular boom in foreign bonds… It was a direct reflection of American credit expansion, and particularly of the low interest rates generated by that expansion” (p.130). To stem the boom, the Fed attempted in vain to use moral suasion on the markets and restrain credit expansion only for “legitimate business. Importantly, consumer “prices generally remained stable and even fell slightly over the period” (p. 86). No doubt the stable consumer prices contributed to the overall sense of economic stability, and the majority of professional economists then did not realize that the economy was not fundamentally sound. To them the bust came as a surprise.

Today, in a similar fashion, the seeds of Depression are sown in China.  Economists hail the growth of China, many not realizing that China is undergoing an inflationary credit boom that dwarfs that American one during the roaring ‘20s. According to official government statistics, 2002 Chinese GDP growth was 8%, and 2003 growth was 8.5%, and some analysts believe these numbers to be conservative. According to the People’s Bank of China own web site (http://www.pbc.gov.cn/english/baogaoyutongjishuju/), “Money & Quasi Money Supply” for 2001/01 was 11.89 trillion, for 2002/01 was 15.96 trillion, for 2003/01 was 19.05 trillion, and for 2004/01 was 22.51 trillion yuan. In other words, money supply for 2001, 2002, and 2003 grew respectively 34.2%, 19.3%, and 18.1%. Thus, during the last three years, money supply in China grew approximately three times faster than money supply in the U.S. during the 1920s.

No wonder the Chinese stock market has been booming and the Chinese real estate market is on fire. Just like the U.S. in the 20s, China finances today foreign countries, mostly the U.S., by buying U.S. government bonds with their trade surplus dollars. Just like the Fed’s failed attempts of moral suasion during the 20s, the Chinese government today similarly attempts in vain to curtail growth of credit by providing it only to those industries that need it, that is, only to industries that the government endorses for usually political reasons. Also, for most of the current boom, Chinese consumer prices have been mostly tame and even falling, while prices for raw commodities have been skyrocketing, which perfectly fits the Austrian view that prices of higher-order goods, such as raw materials, should rise relative to prices of lower-order goods, such as consumer goods. This indeed confirms that credit expansion has already been in progress for a considerable time, and that inflation now is in an advanced stage, although it has not yet reached a runaway mode. Thus, economic conditions in China today are strikingly similar to those in America during the 1920s, and the multi-year credit expansion implies that a bust is inevitable.

There are also important parallels regarding currency and export policy. During the 1920s, the British Pound was overvalued and was used by smaller countries as a reserve currency. While Britain ran its inflationary policies during the 1920’s, it was losing gold to other countries, mainly the United States. Therefore, “if the United States government were to inflate American money, Great Britain would no longer lose gold to the United States” (p. 143). Exacerbating the problem further, the Americans artificially stimulated foreign lending, which further strengthened American farm exports, aggravated the net-export problem, and accelerated the gold flow imbalances. “It [foreign lending] also established American trade, not on a solid foundation of reciprocal and productive exchange, but on a feverish promotion of loans later revealed to be unsound” (p. 139). “[President] Hoover was so enthusiastic about subsidizing foreign loans that he commented later that even bad loans helped American exports and thus provided a cheap form of relief and employment—a cheap form that later brought expensive defaults and financial distress” (p.141) Thus, the preceding discussion makes it clear, that the fundamental reasons behind the American inflationary policy were (1) to check Great Britain’s drains of gold to the United States, (2) to stimulate foreign lending, and (3) to stimulate agricultural exports.

Similarly, today the dollar is overvalued and used as the reserve currency of the world. The U.S. runs its inflationary policy and is losing dollars to the rest of the world, mainly China (and Japan). Today, the currency and export policy of China is anchored around its peg to the dollar. The main reason for this is that by artificially undervaluing its own currency, and therefore overvaluing the dollar, China artificially stimulates its manufacturing exports. The second reason is that by buying the excess U.S. dollars and reinvesting them in U.S. government bonds, it acts as a foreign lender to the United States. The third reason is that this foreign lending stimulates American demand for Chinese manufacturing exports and allows the Chinese government to relieve its current unemployment problems. In other words, the motives behind the Chinese currency and export policy today are identical to the American ones during the 1920s: (1) to support the overvalued U.S. dollar, (2) to stimulate foreign lending, and (3) to stimulate its manufacturing exports. Just like America in the 1920s, China establishes its trade today not on the solid foundation of reciprocal and productive exchange, but on the basis of foreign loans. No doubt, most of these loans will turn out to be very expensive because they will be repaid with greatly depreciated dollars, which in turn will exacerbate down the road the growing financial distress of the banking sector in China.

Therefore, it is clear that China travels today the road to Depression. How severe this depression will be, will critically depend on two developments. First, how much longer the Chinese government will pursue the inflationary policy, and second how doggedly it will fight the bust. The longer it expands and the more its fights the bust, the more likely it is that the Chinese Depression will turn into a Great Depression. Also, it is important to realize that just like America’s Great Depression in the 1930s triggered a worldwide Depression, similarly a Chinese Depression will trigger a bust in the U.S., and therefore a recession in the rest of the world.

Unless there is an unforeseen banking, currency, or a derivative crisis spreading throughout the world, it is my belief that the Chinese bust will occur sometime in 2008-2009, since the Chinese government will surely pursue expansionary policies until the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in China. By then, inflation will be most likely out of control, probably already in runaway mode, and the government will have no choice but to slam the brakes and induce contraction. In 1929 the expansion stopped in July, the stock market broke in October, and the economy collapsed in early 1930. Thus, providing for a latency period of approximately half a year between credit contraction and economic collapse, based on my Olympic Games timing, I would pinpoint the bust for 2009. Admittedly, this is a pure speculation on my part; naturally, the bust could occur sooner or later.

While I base my timing of bust on the 2008 Olympic Games, Marc Faber, the foremost Austrian authority in the world on Chinese economic development, believes that the bust will occur sooner. According to him, the U.S. is due for a meaningful recession relatively soon, which in turn will exacerbate already existing manufacturing overcapacities in China. This, coupled with growing credit problems, makes him believe that China will tip into recession sooner than the Olympic Games. In other words, Dr. Faber believes that a U.S. recession will trigger the Depression in China. Indeed, that very well may be the trigger, but if so, it still remains to be seen whether the Chinese government will let the bust run its course or choose the route of a “crack-up” boom, come hell or high water.

We should also consider another possible trigger for a bust, namely trade surpluses turning into trade deficits due to the accelerated rise of prices for resources, such as commodities, which China must import. Faced with trade deficits, China may decide to dishoard surpluses by selling U.S. government bonds, or it may decide to abandon its peg to the dollar. In either case, this will exacerbate the problems of the ailing U.S. economy, which in turn will boomerang back to China.

Finally, the bust may be triggered by a worldwide crisis in crude oil supplies. Peak oil supply is around the corner, if not already behind us, and Middle East or Caspian instability could sharply cut oil supplies. Historically, oil shortages and their concomitant rise of oil prices have always induced a recession. China’s growing dependence on oil ensures that should an oil crisis occur, it will slip into recession.

To summarize, the likely candidates for a trigger to the Chinese depression are (1) a worldwide currency, banking, or derivatives crisis, (2) a U.S. recession, (3) the containment of runaway inflation, (4) the disappearance of Chinese trade surpluses, and (5) an oil supply crisis.

Whatever the trigger of the bust in China, there is little doubt that this will provide the onset of a worldwide depression. Just like the U.S. emerged from the Great Depression as the unrivalled superpower of the world, so it is likely that China will emerge as the next.

[em17]

请记住,猫科动物只有四个指头,所以没有中指~~~~~

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-19 19:23