[基础问答] The Power of Inaction: Bank Bailouts in Comparison [推广有奖]

0关注
323
粉丝

泰斗

25%

还不是VIP/贵宾

TA的文库 其他...

大家开心文库

威望: 9 级
论坛币: 1025733 个
通用积分: 586.6670
学术水平: 3617 点
热心指数: 3599 点
信用等级: 3043 点
经验: 604432 点
帖子: 1851
精华: 204
在线时间: 2000 小时
注册时间: 2013-10-3
最后登录: 2024-5-7

楼主

大家开心 发表于 2015-7-10 06:57:04 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群|倒序 |AI写论文

相似文件

换一批

是否 +2 论坛币

k人参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

Bank bailouts in the aftermath of the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the onset of the Great Recession brought into sharp relief the power that the global financial sector holds over national politics, and provoked widespread public outrage. In The Power of Inaction, Cornelia Woll details the varying relationships between financial institutions and national governments by comparing national bank rescue schemes in the United States and Europe. Woll starts with a broad overview of bank bailouts in more than twenty countries. Using extensive interviews conducted with bankers, lawmakers, and other key players, she then examines three pairs of countries where similar outcomes might be expected: the United States and United Kingdom, France and Germany, Ireland and Denmark. She finds, however, substantial variation within these pairs. In some cases the financial sector is intimately involved in the design of bailout packages; elsewhere it chooses to remain at arm’s length.

Such differences are often ascribed to one of two conditions: either the state is strong and can impose terms, or the state is weak and corrupted by industry lobbying. Woll presents a third option, where the inaction of the financial sector critically shapes the design of bailout packages in favor of the industry. She demonstrates that financial institutions were most powerful in those settings where they could avoid a joint response and force national policymakers to deal with banks on a piecemeal basis. The power to remain collectively inactive, she argues, has had important consequences for bailout arrangements and ultimately affected how the public and private sectors have shared the cost burden of these massive policy decisions.