延伸一些吧,看看mpt理论,拿出课堂中的一篇讨论
The MPT is regarded as a breakthrough in asset pricing and has great appeal. The MPT is premised on the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The EMH states that all available information has been incorporated into the asset prices. Namely, the stock price responses to economic changes quickly and completely. An important insight of the EMH is that fundamental values of the socio-economic information will be priced in the stock market (Yao, 1998). As Chen at al. (1986) stated, the long-run returns of the asset is influenced by systematic economic news and no additional rewards will be obtained by unsystematic or diversifiable risk.
Unlike traditional philosophy of valuation that tries to price each asset, Markowitz (1952) emphasizes the role of the risk-reducing benefits of diversification, and suggests that investors can obtain greater return with lower risk through diversification when the returns on different investments are not completely correlated. In this framework, the risk of an individual share must be defined jointly with its relation to the whole portfolio components. The lower the correlation between the assets, the greater the effect of risk reduction the diversification provides. Therefore, the MPT anticipates the total assets’ value in the perspective of the investor’s portfolio instead of a single asset.
Another advantage make the theory popular is that the model deals with both the return and risk (Harrington, 1987). Old valuation models discuss risk in a subjective concept: the likelihood of losses, however, the MPT is the function of both the expected return and the risk of the portfolio. It defines return as a probability-weighted mean value and the risk as the variance around the mean. Based on this mean-variance analytical approach, investors seek to maximize their utility by selecting the most “efficient” portfolio, which can be estimated by the individual return of every security in the portfolio and correlation between them (Harrington, 1987). Therefore, the investor’s decision is interpreted as the trade-off between the maximum expected return and the minimum risk.
Although the MPT offers an ideal framework to value the asset, it requires sophisticated calculation to estimate the expected return and risk of every asset in the portfolio (Elton and Gruber, 1995). The difficulty in estimating the forecast return and risk as well as the complicated calculation greatly limits its application. Over the past decades, several new models have been developed based on Markowitz’s (1952) mean-variance analytical framework, among which the most widely known is the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).