楼主: 智能xyz
1956 0

[分享]Effectiveness of tax incentives to boost (retirement) saving: theoretical mo  关闭 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 1粉丝

已卖:172份资源

讲师

28%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
11235 个
通用积分
0.0622
学术水平
6 点
热心指数
16 点
信用等级
3 点
经验
15560 点
帖子
566
精华
0
在线时间
312 小时
注册时间
2008-5-23
最后登录
2019-4-24

楼主
智能xyz 发表于 2009-5-12 04:52:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Type: Journal Articles
Published in: OECD Economic Studies
Volume, issue, pages: No 39, pp. 145-167

The adequacy of household saving for retirement has become a policy issue all around the world. The UK and US have been in the vanguard of those countries that have tried to encourage retirement saving by providing tax-favoured treatment for particular savings accounts. We consider empirical evidence from these two countries regarding the extent to which funds in some specific tax advantaged accounts (IRAs in the US, TESSAs and ISAs in the UK) represent new savings. Our best interpretation of this evidence is that: only relatively small fractions of these funds can be considered to be "new" saving and so these policies have been an expensive means of encouraging saving; there has been some deadweight loss from the policies associated with "reshuffling" of existing savings. Continuing improvements in data on individual financial behaviour create scope for future empirical analysis of incentives to save, both within the standard economic framework that we explain and exploit, and by considering extensions to and adaptations of it.

 


324531.pdf (256.39 KB, 需要: 5 个论坛币)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Theoretical ectiveness INCENTIVES Retirement Theoretic evidence tax Saving motivation Retirement

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-26 07:02