请选择 进入手机版 | 继续访问电脑版
楼主: oliyiyi
1066 3

Is a Chief Data Officer Required for Analytics Success? [推广有奖]

版主

泰斗

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

计量文库

威望
7
论坛币
272151 个
通用积分
31269.3519
学术水平
1435 点
热心指数
1554 点
信用等级
1345 点
经验
383775 点
帖子
9598
精华
66
在线时间
5467 小时
注册时间
2007-5-21
最后登录
2024-4-16

初级学术勋章 初级热心勋章 初级信用勋章 中级信用勋章 中级学术勋章 中级热心勋章 高级热心勋章 高级学术勋章 高级信用勋章 特级热心勋章 特级学术勋章 特级信用勋章

oliyiyi 发表于 2016-8-12 09:39:02 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

n this insightful opinion piece, gain perspective on whether a Chief Data Officer is required for an organization's analytics success.

comments

By Gahl Berkooz, Global Chief of Analytics, General Motors.

The Data Organization, headed by the CDO, typically operates in three dimensions:

  • Governance – identifying, developing, and promulgating data definitions, data standards, and data quality metrics. Once developed, a good CDO will create score cards that measure data quality by business function, and utilize enterprise data governance to hold the business functions to continuous improvement of data quality.
  • Data preparation for Analytics – the adage that 80% of the effort of an analytics project is getting the data ready is true. A CDO often serves the Analytics teams by loading, cleansing, transforming, and packaging data. This makes the Data Scientists/Mathematicians more efficient, and increases the throughput of the Analytics teams.
  • Solving business problems with data root causes – A CDO can take on the role of “owner of the data assets of the company.” As such, s/he will seek to improve and buttress the asset. Where there is business inefficiency as a result of data issues (a.k.a Data Waste), or an opportunity for business innovation through superior data, the CDO will work with the business functions to deliver the opportunity. This results in data standards and improvements to data at the source, the transactional systems used by the business function. Assuring data quality at the source in required to sustain the efficiency or innovation, and reduces the Data Waste analytics projects need to contend with. A good description of how it was done at Ford Motor Company is available HERE.

For Analytics to be successful in the long run, i.e. for Analytics solutions to be deployed in an embedded and ongoing decision support capacity, data disconnects need to addressed at the source. The Data Waste that required 80% of the effort in Analytics projects needs to be gone for good. Data must arrive in a “clean” state from the original transactional systems or sensors (in the case of a connected product.) Analytics that rely on the Data Organization continually, and manually, cleansing and transforming data does not scale: every new Analytics capability results in an incremental task for the Data organization, an additional “pancake” on the stack.

How can the CDO eliminate data disconnects at the source? The simplistic answer is through Governance. In theory the Data Organization will set standards and hold the business functions accountable to following them. This is easier said than done – data inside an established business function has evolved over time to optimize the operations of that function. Modifying the data to comply with new standards has a cost and a potential adverse impact on efficiency in the originating function. The argument of “do the right thing for the enterprise” can be invoked, but that will be followed with a discussion about the business value of the Analytics versus the cost and loss of efficiency. The way to avoid getting bogged down in such a conversation is to eliminate Data Waste in a way that is a win-win.

When the Data Organization solves business problems with data root causes, it has the opportunity to set information standards whose implementation is a net-gain to the business functions. This is the third dimension for the Data Organization, as mentioned above. How to build this capacity in the Data Organization is a conversation on its own (a description of how it was done at Ford Motor Company is available HERE.) Once the operational benefit from Data Waste elimination is delivered, the business functions get a return on the investment of cleaning up information at the source. This provides the business functions with the motivation required to clean up the data and adhere to standards. As described HERE, building a Data Organization that eliminates Data Waste in the business functions is challenging, yet rewarding to the company and the team.

So, the answer to the question is: depends. The make a sustainable impact on an Analytics, the CDO needs to create self-sustaining momentum of elimination of Data Waste in the company as a whole - not just focused on Analytics.

This post reflects my personal views. The views herein do not represent the views of my employer.

Bio: Gahl Berkooz, Ph.D. is a Global Chief of Analytics, Global Connected Consumer Experience (GM/GCCX) at General Motors. He is based in Detroit area, MI, USA.



二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Analytics required Analytic Officer Success standards developed function business required

缺少币币的网友请访问有奖回帖集合
https://bbs.pinggu.org/thread-3990750-1-1.html
h2h2 发表于 2016-8-12 11:25:41 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享

使用道具

william9225 学生认证  发表于 2016-8-12 13:55:01 来自手机 |显示全部楼层 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享

使用道具

Excellent.

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-18 08:16