Untangling knowledge recombination

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

【作者(必填)】

• Ting Xiao
  

• The Ohio State U.
  

• Mona V Makhija
  

【文题(必填)】

---

---

---

Untangling knowledge recombination: highlighting knowledge architecture on innovation outcomes【年份(必填)】
2015
【全文链接或数据库名称(选填)】

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：文献求助 管理类 Architecture combination Untangling 数据库

Xiao, Ting, and Mona V. Makhija. "Untangling knowledge recombination: highlighting knowledge architecture on innovation outcomes." Academy of Management Proceedings. Vol. 2015. No. 1. Academy of Management, 2015. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2015.13268abstract

因为是会议文章，数据库只收录了摘要如下，无全文

Untangling knowledge recombination: highlighting knowledge architecture on innovation outcomes.
Authors:
Ting Xiao1
Makhija, Mona V.1
Source:
Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings. 2015, p1-1. 1p.
Document Type:
Article
Abstract:
According to the knowledge recombination perspective, innovation comes about through manipulation of knowledge components as well as the architecture of these components (reflected in the linkages among components). Nonetheless, the literature lacks a systematic explanation for how variations in architecture influence innovation outcomes. The purpose of this research is to address this problem. Treating architectural linkages as routines that enrich the meaning and function of individual components, we identify two key characteristics of architecture--the extent and non- decomposability of linkages. We examine how changes in these characteristics influence innovation novelty and use. Using pharmaceutical industry patent data from 1976 to 2014, we find that, for pairs of firm-specific patents that hold components constant, change in both extent and non-decomposability of linkages has a positive relationship with innovation novelty. In addition, the findings indicate that such architectural changes reduce external firms' ability to utilize the innovation, but provide the innovating firm with an advantage in this regard. In doing so, this research demonstrates that the treatment of novelty and use of an innovation as positively correlated outcomes in the literature does not always hold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings is the property of Academy of Management and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Author Affiliations:
1The Ohio State U.
ISSN:
2151-6561
DOI:
10.5465/AMBPP.2015.13268abstract
Accession Number:
116916041
Rights Notice:
This database normally includes full text of articles available from this publication. However, this particular article is not included at the request of the rights holder.