Using R within a latex document can be a component of reproducible research,
offering (a) some assurance against typographical errors in transcribing
results to the latex file and (b) the ability for others to reproduce the
results.
For example, one might like to explain how close the computed
integral of the Witch of Agnesi function
12 | woa <- function(x, a=1) 8 * a^3 / (x^2 + 4*a^2)integrate(woa, -Inf, Inf) |
is to the true value of $4pi$. One way to do that is to compute the mismatch
12 | estimate <- integrate(woa, -Inf, Inf)$valuetheory <- 4 * pi |
and to write something like
dots the misfit is Sexpr{abs(estimate-theory)}
in latex. However, the slew of digits is not especially useful, and the
computer-type exponential notation is not conventional in written work.
It would be good to have a function that writes such results in latex format.
MethodsA trial function is below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112131415161718 | scinot <- function(x, digits=2, showDollar=FALSE){ sign <- "" if (x < 0) { sign <- "-" x <- -x } exponent <- floor(log10(x)) if (exponent) { xx <- round(x / 10^exponent, digits=digits) e <- paste("\\times 10^{", as.integer(exponent), "}", sep="") } else { xx <- round(x, digits=digits) e <- "" } if (showDollar) paste("$", sign, xx, e, "$", sep="") else paste(sign, xx, e, sep="")} |
and a latex/sweave test use is
Limits may be infinite if set to texttt{Inf}, e.g. for the witch of Agnesifunction<<>>=woa <- function(x, a=1) 8 * a^3 / (x^2 + 4*a^2)integrate(woa, -Inf, Inf)@<<results=hide, echo=false>>=woa <- function(x, a=1) 8 * a^3 / (x^2 + 4*a^2)i <- integrate(woa, -Inf, Inf)$valueerr <- abs((i - 4 * pi) / (4 * pi))@the results differ from the true value $4pi$ by $Sexpr{scinot(err, 0)}$.which yields as shown in the screenshot below. (Note that there is some
colourization and margin decoration that is not described by the code given
above.)
- R source code used here: 2015-03-22-scinot.R.
- Jekyll source code for this blog entry: 2015-03-22-scinot.Rmd