楼主: william9225
1315 12

[其他] 【评论】China has most to lose in US trade showdown, says report [推广有奖]

版主

巨擘

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

文库之星

【William新闻精选】

2019经济报刊周刊精选

威望
15
论坛币
1005146 个
通用积分
1107.1786
学术水平
3616 点
热心指数
3969 点
信用等级
3571 点
经验
676818 点
帖子
18353
精华
60
在线时间
4874 小时
注册时间
2015-2-12
最后登录
2024-8-27

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

source from:ft
China trade  Add to myFT
China has most to lose in US trade showdown, says report
http---com.ft.imagepublish.prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com-30aee03e-83f9-11e7-94e2-c5b9.jpeg
Little impact on developed economies but spill over could mean pain for US consumers


3 HOURS AGO by: Tom Mitchell in Beijing
The immediate impact of any trade war between the US and China would be worse for Beijing, according to a new analysis of multinational companies’ exposure to the Chinese market.

Nor would the export sectors of the US and other major developed countries be significantly affected by an economic slowdown in China, says a report by The Conference Board drawing on export data.

The New York-based corporate think tank found that US and EU value-added exports to China were equivalent to 0.7 per cent and 1.6 per cent respectively of national economic outputs. Even for neighbouring Japan, the figure was just 2.1 per cent.

China’s value-added exports to the US, by contrast, were equivalent to roughly 3 per cent of its gross domestic product, suggesting that Beijing has more to lose in any trade showdown with the Trump administration.

“A trade war between the US and China, as seen through these data, doesn’t appear to be a major threat to the US economy,” said Erik Lundh, one of the report’s authors who is a senior Conference Board economist.

Mr Lundh, however, warned that the collateral damage from all-out trade war between the world’s two largest economies would be considerable for both sides.

“A trade war between the US and China would spill over into other important facets of the relationship that could be quite painful for the US,” he said, noting that American consumers would be hit by higher prices for imported goods. “A collapse in US trade with China would have an immediate impact on consumers vis-à-vis inflation.”


http---com.ft.imagepublish.prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com-2a12811c-85e4-11e7-8bb1-5ba5.png
Last week Steve Bannon, the controversial political adviser to US President Donald Trump who was ousted on Friday, said that the US and China were engaged in an “economic war” from which there could only be one winner.

China’s foreign ministry responded that both sides would suffer in the event of increased trade friction between the world’s two largest economies.

A trade war between the US and China would spill over into other important facets of the relationship that could be quite painful for the US

ERIK LUNDH, CONFERENCE BOARD SENIOR ECONOMIST
In its report released on Monday, The Conference Board breaks down traditional trade data that treats, for example, a Canadian tractor sold in China as an entirely Canadian export even if constructed partly with US-sourced components. The Conference Board’s figures instead count the Canadian tractor’s US components as US exports to China.

Similarly, components sourced from South Korea and Taiwan for a China-made iPhone that is ultimately sold in the US are counted as Korean and Taiwanese exports to the US.

The report found that while MNCs’ direct and indirect exposures to everything from Chinese currency policies to outbound tourism are “intensifying in terms of reach and magnitude”, from a trade perspective “the world, by and large, bears low dependencies on China”.

Notable exceptions include South Korea and big natural resource exporters such as Australia, whose value-added exports to China are equivalent to 6.8 per cent and 4.4 per cent respectively of their annual economic output. Beijing has used its economic leverage over Seoul in an attempt to prevent the deployment of a US anti-missile system.


http---com.ft.imagepublish.prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com-02b70f7e-8405-11e7-a4ce-15b2.png
Trade figures that capture the complexity of modern supply chains, by tracking the origin of components rather than just finished products, tend to show that bilateral trade imbalances are often exaggerated.

In March, The Conference Board estimated that based on value-added goods and services exports, the US trade deficit with China in 2014 was 200bn dollars — or nearly half the 360bn dollars deficit based on traditional trade data.

China is the world’s biggest importer of food and energy, buying about 20 per cent of global exports in both sectors. It is also the dominant customer for many small, energy-rich nations. In 2015 China purchased 40-90 per cent of the crude oil produced by Congo, Angola, Oman, Yemen and South Sudan.
http---com.ft.imagepublish.prod-us.s3.amazonaws.com-05cfd66e-8405-11e7-a4ce-15b2.png
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
bonds 发表于 2017-8-21 06:54:23 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
301调查,桥旧但work....

使用道具

藤椅
h2h2 发表于 2017-8-21 07:00:10 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享

使用道具

板凳
军旗飞扬 发表于 2017-8-21 07:21:10 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢楼主分享!

使用道具

报纸
MouJack007 发表于 2017-8-21 07:30:41 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢楼主分享!

使用道具

地板
MouJack007 发表于 2017-8-21 07:32:25 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

7
albertwishedu 发表于 2017-8-21 08:19:41 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

8
lianqu 发表于 2017-8-21 11:24:30 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群

使用道具

9
被被 发表于 2017-8-21 12:39:28 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
谢谢分享!

使用道具

10
啸傲江弧 发表于 2017-8-22 00:04:02 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
Thanks for sharing!

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-9-20 06:36