昨天阅读0.5小时,累计阅读3小时;
经济学人2018 March 13, AI-Spy,
全文链接为:https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21739658-artificial-intelligence-pushes-beyond-tech-industry-work-could-become-faireror-more (需要使用VPN,网速比较慢)
“As regulators and employers weigh the pros and cons of AI in the workplace, three principles ought to guide its spread. First, data should be anonymised where possible. Microsoft, for example, has a product that shows individuals how they manage their time in the office, but gives managers information only in aggregated form. Second, the use of AI ought to be transparent. Employees should be told what technologies are being used in their workplaces and which data are being gathered. As a matter of routine, algorithms used by firms to hire, fire and promote should be tested for bias and unintended consequences. Last, countries should let individuals request their own data, whether they are ex-workers wishing to contest a dismissal or jobseekers hoping to demonstrate their ability to prospective employers.”
看完文章,有些比较大的感触,人工智能的迅速发展,为大数据的分析提供了可能,现在我们浏览网络时,跳出的广告都是比较有针对性的,这也侧面应征了脸书的数据泄密,个人隐私该如何保护。同时老板可以对顾工进行上班时间的监督,如是否用上班时间做私人事情、工作的效率如何、产出怎么样、与人合作等等,很多具有针对性的创新企业正在行政,辅助领导的工作,导致可替代的工种越来越多,首当其冲的便是零售领域、纺织等,造成低技能工人的低情绪,人工智能缺乏人性,这也是需要关注的地方。现在的人工智能无处不在,似乎,作为普通的我们,只能适应它。
|