20180727【充实计划】第780期

2018.7.27
昨日阅读5小时  累计阅读484小时。

昨日阅读时间1小时，累计阅读时间196小时

昨天阅读1小时，累计20小时

昨天阅读5小时，累计阅读970小时

昨天阅读1小时，累计阅读109小时

充实每一天 发表于 2018-7-27 07:28
【加入充实计划】【了解充实计划】

|新充实挑战|    |公告【想成为牛人】|

昨日2小时，累计666小时

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读826小时

昨天阅读2.5小时，共阅读461小时。

充实每一天 发表于 2018-7-27 07:28
【加入充实计划】【了解充实计划】

|新充实挑战|    |公告【想成为牛人】|

昨日阅读1小时，累计阅读253小时。

昨日阅读一小时
想买Kindle，oasis2好用么？
MOVING FOR PROSPERITY，世界银行调查报告，英文，看的比较慢，只看了大概四分之一
摘一些
The debate on the economics of migration needs both sides to be better listeners. Many economists, who believe in the virtue of open markets, are rightly focused on the efficiency gains that would be realized if labor were to move more freely. Despite the large range of estimates, the gains, especially those realized by the migrants, will be substantial—as evidenced by the wage gaps across markets. The mistake is to ignore the distributional impact and dislocation such flows would generate, especially in destination countries, as the efficiency gains are realized
后续的还在看，不过个人感觉未来会两极化人口高流动国家与封闭国家，前者大多为旅游，医疗，进出口（转运），后者可能受民粹主义影响
而且相对来说目前移民劳动力还是低廉，薪资增长缓慢的，机会也大多集中在发展中国家，所以国内前景还是不错的。