楼主: 细分市场747
386 0

[英文文献] Bid-Ask Spreads, Volume, and Volatility: Evidence from Livestock Markets-买卖... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-21
最后登录
2020-9-21

楼主
细分市场747 发表于 2006-1-19 20:17:25 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Bid-Ask Spreads, Volume, and Volatility: Evidence from Livestock Markets-买卖价差、成交量和波动性:来自牲畜市场的证据
英文文献作者:Frank, Julieta,Garcia, Philip
英文文献摘要:
Understanding the determinants of liquidity costs in agricultural futures markets is hampered by a need to use proxies for the bid-ask spread which are often biased, and by a failure to account for a jointly determined micro-market structure. We estimate liquidity costs and its determinants for the live cattle and hog futures markets using alternative liquidity cost estimators, intraday prices and micro-market information. Volume and volatility are simultaneously determined and significantly related to the bid-ask spread. Daily volume is negatively related to the spread while volatility and volume per transaction display positive relationships. Electronic trading has a significant competitive effect on liquidity costs, particularly in the live cattle market. Results are sensitive to the bid-ask spread measure, with a modified Bayesian method providing estimates most consistent with expectations and the competitive structure found in these markets.

对农业期货市场流动性成本决定因素的理解受到了阻碍,原因是需要使用买卖价差的代理(通常存在偏差),以及未能考虑共同确定的微观市场结构。我们使用替代性流动性成本估算器、日内价格和微观市场信息来估计活牛和生猪期货市场的流动性成本及其决定因素。成交量和波动率同时确定,并与买卖价差显著相关。日成交量与价差呈负相关,波动率与单交易量呈正相关。电子交易对流动性成本具有显著的竞争效应,尤其是在活牛市场。结果是敏感的买卖价差措施,与改进的贝叶斯方法提供估计最一致的预期和竞争结构发现在这些市场。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 07:06