发帖
雷达卡
英文文献：Using Linked Household-level Datasets to Explain Consumer Response to BSE in Canada-使用连接的家庭水平数据集解释消费者对加拿大疯牛病的反应
英文文献作者：Wang, Xin,Maynard, Leigh J.,Butler, J.S.
英文文献摘要：
Household-level Canadian meat purchases from 2002-2008, household-level egg purchases from 2002-2005 and Food Opinion Survey in 2008 were used to understand how consumers who have different concerns about nutrition react to BSE events and how beef consumption after BSE discoveries were shaped by consumers concerns of food safety and their trust of government and the industry decision makers. Three measures of beef purchased were used to explore consumers’ reaction. A random effects logit model was applied to test whether any beef purchased during a given month. Consumption in terms of unit purchases was measured with a random effects Negative Binomial model and consumption in terms of beef expenditure was measured with a standard random effects model. Consumer behaviors in Alberta differed from Ontario. Consumer reactions to BSE in Alberta were stronger than Ontario. Overall, the more risk consumers attached to BSE, the less beef they purchased in both provinces. Random effects in the three models controlled for unobserved but persistent aspects of households and changed the sign of estimated effects of demographic variables.
实施减贫加拿大购买肉类从2002年到2008年,家庭层面蛋购买从2002 - 2005年和2008年食品民意调查被用来了解的消费者有不同的营养反应的担忧疯牛病事件和牛肉消费疯牛病后发现是如何受到消费者关注食品安全和信任政府和行业的决策者。用三种标准来考察消费者对购买牛肉的反应。一个随机效应logit模型被用于测试在给定的一个月内是否有牛肉被购买。以单位购买为单位的消费用随机效应负二项模型来衡量，以牛肉支出为单位的消费用标准随机效应模型来衡量。艾伯塔省的消费者行为与安大略省不同。阿尔伯塔省消费者对疯牛病的反应强于安大略省。总的来说，消费者患疯牛病的风险越大，他们在这两个省购买的牛肉就越少。三种模型中的随机效应控制了家庭中未被观察但持久的方面，并改变了人口统计变量估计影响的迹象。
京公网安备 11010802022788号
