发帖
雷达卡
Harmonics Theory - The Physics and Maths （Last Part）
| Major and Secondary Scales |
Thefollowing graph is based on only the main line harmonics, which as well asbeing detrended have had an additional adjustment to increase the variations athigh harmonic number and reduce them at low harmonic number. This adjustment isnot strictly necessary, but there is a clear trend for the waves to get smalleras we go from small to large harmonics and the idea is simply to make a morecommon basis throughout.
Thereare a series of major peaks at about 4.5 differences in log10(H) the first ofwhich is the strong harmonic 34560 (and its mate 17280). Early in my harmonicsstudies I realized that these peaks occurred after each time the prime 5appeared and that they were at ratios of about 34560 apart. It was also seenthat secondary peaks happened after each ratio of 3 in the main line. To makethese things clear, the main line harmonic ratios are shown along the top ofthe graph. Additional peaks and troughs are caused by the higher primes whichlargely determine the variations in the shapes and spacings of these fairlyregular peaks.
| Observed Major Structure Scales |
Whenwe observe the real universe there are a set of different structures that areat distance ratios of around 10^4.5 as the theory predicts. These structuresare:
Hubble scale, Galaxies, Stars,Planets, Moons, X, Y, Z, Atoms, Nucleons, (quarks?)
The Zscale is associated with cells of the size of bacteria and is a common size forinterstellar dust. I refer to the largest scale as the Hubble scale, orsometimes as the observable universe, but it should not be called the universe.Universe means everything and cosmologists agree that the universe may belarger than the presently observed scale. The scales labeled X and Y appear tobe missing structures but the pattern continues beyond them in the same rhythm.
Hereis a schematic which shows accurately the distance scales between occurrencesof each type of object. The line is a crude representation of the relativestrength of each type of energy formation with major scales shown in bold andrelated secondary scales not in bold.
Thescale ratios of the major structures is very similar to the typical spacing ofthe theoretical prediction averaging 10^4.56 or 36000. The secondary peaks areat various ratios such as 12 between the spiral galaxy spacings and the smallirregular galaxies, 14 between the gas giants and terrestrial planets and about22 between the Hydrogen Bohr radius and the electron wavelength. The presenceof various primes in these ratios may give clues to correct correspondencebetween the theoretical and observed patterns.
Althoughthe major peaks are fairly regularly spaced, there are some a little wider andsome a little narrower. The galaxy:star distance scale ratio is a bit largerand the planet:moon distance ratio a bit smaller. These characteristics do notfit the theoretical spacings if the Hubble scale is taken as the size of theuniverse. However if the Hubble scale is lined up with peak 2 then the spacingsdo correctly match.
| The Fundamental Cycle |
Aneven more definitive test is to compare the observed cycles in various rangesand the ratios between them, to the predicted prime ratios in the main lineharmonics. In particular the ratios 11, 13 and 17 occur sufficiently rarely toafford a correct match should they be found in actual cycles periods ordistance ratios. Such a test establishes without doubt that the universe ismuch bigger than the Hubble scale with the most likely estimate being 10^13times bigger. In the scientific age, no measurement of such large scales hasbeen possible before. However it does continue an established trend of theestimated size of the universe increasing in leaps and bounds from century tocentury.
Theabove graph shows the result of comparing many cycles with accurately knownperiods in the range of 600 million years down to about a month to the patternof predicted harmonics when various different values for the fundamental cycleare tested. The Hubble scale is near the extreme right and values were testedcontinuously through to 10^24 years. A series of peaks, all far moresignificant than any others, appear centered on 1.4821824*10^23 years. Thereason for the multiple peaks is that the harmonics are very similar whendisplaced by a factor of 2 and quite similar at factors of 3, 4, 6 and 3/2.
Usingthis 1.482*10^23 year fundamental oscillation period of the universe as astarting point and the harmonics theory as a basis, it is possible to determinethe entire energy distribution of the universe as both cycle periods anddistance scales. The distance scales are closely related to the time periods,being the distance that light will travel in that time. It will be seen thatthere are many matches between the distances and the periods, something that isaided by using light years for distances because they are then directlycomparable to the years used for cycles. When the astronomers favored units ofparsecs are used the matches are not obvious to the unaided human eye.
Inthese longer cycle periods, there are sufficient cycles measurements fromastronomy, geology, paleontology, climatology and economics to make linkages ofsmall number ratios all the way from 600 million years down to a month. Belowthe period of a month, there are a number of gaps with a number of regions ofknown linkages alternating, and it has not been possible to fully establish thelinkages. There are interesting clues with the ratios 11, 17 and 19 in thetheory and observations of such ratios in nature, but although these ratiosoccur in the correct order, the spacings do not match correctly. Thisdiscrepancy is an indication that one of the assumptions made at the beginningof the calculations was slightly wrong and will require further study todetermine the necessary corrections. This work needs to involve bothmathematicians and physicists.
| Commonly Reported Cycles |
Thefollowing table shows commonly reported cycles periods that are linked by exactprime number ratios and includes many accurately measured cycle periods. Thetable has ratios of 2 horizontally and 3 vertically, except where larger primeratios are shown on the right side.
Specificcycles reported from different disciplines are:
586.24MY - Geology - S Afanasiev
~600,~300, ~150, 74 and 37 MY - Geology - G Williams et al
80.0,53.3, 26.65 MY - Paleontology: Mass extinctions
2.22MLY - Astronomy - Andromeda distance
1.11MY - Astronomy - Solar system energy exchange
0.111,0.0555 MY - Astronomy - Solar system dynamics
4600,2300 Y - Climatology, Solar(?) - H H Lamb
4634,2317, 771 Y - Astronomy - Outer planet alignments
~1000,510, 170 Y - Weather etc - R Wheeler
355 -Historical and other - Chizhevski et al
178 -Astronomy - Outer planet dynamics, Sunspots(?)
143,53, 22.0, 17.7, 11.2, 9.6, 6.0 Y - Wars - Chizhevski
8.9,4.45 Y - Economics - Recessions
11.86Y - Astronomy - Jupiter's orbital period
5.93 Y- Commodities
3.390Y - US Stock market - E Dewey, R Mogey
1.695Y - Commodities
154-155,77 d = 0.423, 0.211 Y - Astronomy - Solar Corona
25.8 d= 0.0706 Y - Astronomy - Solar rotation
Seealso table of Ed Dewey cycles.
| Origin of the Harmonics Theory |
TheHarmonics theory came about through the study of cycles. The first four commoncycles that I found were almost exact fractions of 35.6 years, being 1/4, 1/5,1/6 and 1/8 of that figure. The following figure shows the discovered cyclesperiods and the arrows are at exact fractions of 35.6 years. These cyclesexisted in the Chinese economy, but later I was to find that they also existedthroughout the world and even beyond. Other cycles that I found were alsofractions of 35.6 years.
When Idiscovered a whole set of cycles in 44 years of weekly corn prices I realizedthat they had frequencies that were in exactly the same ratios as the whitenotes on the piano plus two black notes (Eb and Bb). Then I noticed that the4:5:6:8 frequency of the original cycles was a major chord in music. At thetime this was altogether too weird - was God playing major chords in the Chineseeconomy and scales in corn prices? I didn't mention it to people because itseemed that I would get laughed at. Then in the mid to late 1990s I found outthat there was a place called the Foundation for the Study of Cycles and paidthem a visit in the USA. What I found was that quite a few things that I thoughtI had discovered were already known to Dewey and other researchers. Partly Iwas upset because my "discoveries" were not original, but partly theconfirmations assured me that what I had found was very real and verypervasive, because Dewey studies different time series from different countriesand even over different time intervals.
EdDewey, who formed the Foundation for the Study of Cycles made a lifelong studyof cycles in everything that he could. After producing, collecting and collatingseveral thousand reports of cycles he reached a number of conclusions. Theywere:
I had,like Dewey and others, only gradually come to the understanding that thesecycles arrive from outside the earth. Not only that, but quite a few of themfitted with planetary alignments, and many serious scientists or analysts donot want to go there because that is astrology and only quacks do astrology.However it is a fact that these relationships exist. There are several reasonswhy the planetary alignments match common cycle periods, and others why the Sunis affected by planetary alignments.
| No Big Bang |
Althoughthe Harmonics theory was described above in terms of the non-linearity ofstandard physics wave equations, that is not how it was discovered. That wasthe result of trying connect an already successful theory with the prevailingscientific view. In that prevailing view there was one thing that was entirelyunacceptable to the Harmonics theory reconciling with accepted physics, andthat was the Big Bang theory. The Harmonics theory logically follows fromMaxwell's equations and General Relativity but requires that the universe mustbe much older than Big Bang cosmology and have continuous wave communicationbetween its parts to gradually develop harmonics over many cycles ofoscillation of even large scales such as the Hubble scale. That is, theHarmonics theory is an oscillating universe theory, a view that has beenflirted with by cosmologists at times. Also, the Harmonics theory is very clearin the order of formation from the top down and not the bottom up. This easilyexplains the large scale structure in the universe such as the very cleargalactic super cluster scale which, although very clearly observed, is largelyswept under the carpet in Big Bang circles because it just does not fit withthe theory.
"Experimentand observation are the judges in science, the only problem is that not everyoneunderstands the verdict."
Hereis one of a number of cosmological studies that show that galactic superclusters exist at regularly spaced intervals. The quote from New Scientist inthe graphic is no longer correct, there is a theory that expected not only thatsuch structures existed but correctly predicted the spacings. That theory isthe Harmonics theory, and it links these large structures with huge waves inthe universe and the period of waves of just this size are found as one of thestrongest geological cycles periods. Because that cycles period is knownaccurately it allows the accurate determination of the Hubble constant,something not yet achieved by "existing theories".
2019年9月20日下午三点焦炭主力合约J2001分析结果：
京公网安备 11010802022788号
