楼主: boaiwangzi
3155 8

[学科前沿] 四大权威软件比较!! [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 9粉丝

VIP

已卖:1237份资源

讲师

68%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1684 个
通用积分
35.1814
学术水平
21 点
热心指数
29 点
信用等级
18 点
经验
5774 点
帖子
342
精华
0
在线时间
551 小时
注册时间
2006-10-1
最后登录
2022-12-9

楼主
boaiwangzi 发表于 2010-4-7 19:10:58 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
R:
R is a free software package which is designed for use with command line only. While being a language is one of R's greatest strengths, it can make it harder to learn for those without programming experience. However, once learnt, you are no longer subject to price increases. The developer’s community ensures to constantly provide add-ons and also ensures that the software will continue to exist. R is extremely versatile in graphics, and generally good for people who really want to find out “what their data have to say”.
SAS:
SAS is the second most costly package. It can be used with, both, command line and graphical user interface (GUI). SAS is particularly strong on data management
(especially with large files), and good for cutting edge research. It covers many graphical and statistical tasks. The main focus is on business customers now.
SPSS:
SPSS is the first choice for the occasional user. However, it is the most expensive of the four. SPSS is clearly designed for point-and-click usage on the GUI. A command structure exists, but it is not well defined and sometimes inconsistent. SPSS is good for basic data management and basic statistical analysis, but rather weak in graphics. In the future, SPSS might be the weakest of the four packages with regard to the scope of statistical procedures it offers due to its main focus on business customers.
Stata:
Stata is designed for the usage by command line, but it also offers a GUI that allows for working with menus. The simple and consistent command structure makes it rather easy to learn. It is the cheapest of the packages that entail costs, and it offers additional reductions for the educational sector. Stata is relatively weak on ANOVA, but extraordinary on regression analysis and complex survey designs. Stata is completely focused on scholars. In the future, Stata may have the strongest collection of advanced statistical procedures.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:软件比较 Statistical Programming educational statistica experience developer software continue designed

回帖推荐

remeva 发表于7楼  查看完整内容

STATA是做面板比较牛,但是会用到一些命令什么的,没深入研究过。EVIEW可以做面板,傻瓜操作,因为不用什么命令,知道点点点就行了,所以用的人也多嘛。SPSS现在现在纳入了好多的东西,什么神经网络什么的,俺用的也不多,SAS是业界大佬了,因为要编程,所以用的人就是些能编程的人。相比较,做金融的时候,俺还是喜欢用MATLAB。

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
boaiwangzi 发表于 2010-4-7 19:15:20
R:
R is a free software package which is designed for use with command line only. While being a language is one of R's greatest strengths, it can make it harder to learn for those without programming experience. However, once learnt, you are no longer subject to price increases. The developer’s community ensures to constantly provide add-ons and also ensures that the software will continue to exist. R is extremely versatile in graphics, and generally good for people who really want to find out “what their data have to say”.
SAS:
SAS is the second most costly package. It can be used with, both, command line and graphical user interface (GUI). SAS is particularly strong on data management (especially with large files), and good for cutting edge research. It covers many graphical and statistical tasks. The main focus is on business customers now.
SPSS:
SPSS is the first choice for the occasional user. However, it is the most expensive of the four. SPSS is clearly designed for point-and-click usage on the GUI. A command structure exists, but it is not well defined and sometimes inconsistent. SPSS is good for basic data management and basic statistical analysis, but rather weak in graphics. In the future, SPSS might be the weakest of the four packages with regard to the scope of statistical procedures it offers due to its main focus on business customers.
Stata:
Stata is designed for the usage by command line, but it also offers a GUI that allows for working with menus. The simple and consistent command structure makes it rather easy to learn. It is the cheapest of the packages that entail costs, and it offers additional reductions for the educational sector. Stata is relatively weak on ANOVA, but extraordinary on regression analysis and complex survey designs. Stata is completely focused on scholars. In the future, Stata may have the strongest collection of advanced statistical procedures.
if you want to know more details about Statistical software,please open the following page.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_statistical_packages

藤椅
听海无声 发表于 2010-4-7 20:00:22
eviews呢?
一生负气成今日,四海无人对夕阳

板凳
boaiwangzi 发表于 2010-4-7 20:01:30
eviews大家感觉怎么样?排第五差不多吧!

报纸
zkyjesu 在职认证  发表于 2010-4-7 20:13:12
我觉得现在好多国人都在用eview
the more I see the less I know
the more like to let it go

地板
boaiwangzi 发表于 2010-4-7 21:24:20
我怎么不觉得呢,现在学术做的好的都在用stata的吧,目前许多文章都用到面板数据模型,stata软件做面板数据模型特别适合,相比eviews,优势特别大!

7
remeva 发表于 2010-4-8 01:06:43
STATA是做面板比较牛,但是会用到一些命令什么的,没深入研究过。EVIEW可以做面板,傻瓜操作,因为不用什么命令,知道点点点就行了,所以用的人也多嘛。SPSS现在现在纳入了好多的东西,什么神经网络什么的,俺用的也不多,SAS是业界大佬了,因为要编程,所以用的人就是些能编程的人。相比较,做金融的时候,俺还是喜欢用MATLAB。
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
胖胖小龟宝 + 10 + 10 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 经验 + 10  论坛币 + 10   查看全部评分

8
remeva 发表于 2010-4-8 01:09:28
再说了,软件只是工具而已。能说明研究问题就行了。倒是现在,好多问题都没有现成软件估计,金融学计量尽搞些个编程的去了,活像是学计算机的,真是无奈。55555

9
luxiahyun 发表于 2010-4-8 09:12:02
Eviews 在时间序列的操作中是最方便的。
而处理面板数据的时候Stata是最方便的。
R是免费软件。
SPSS是统计软件。。。适用于统计分析,适用于数据挖掘。
SAS则适合处理金融数据,尤其当数据非常庞大的时候。
此外,世界级的顶级高手们都喜欢用Gauss,用来编写程序。因为Eviews和Stata里头的模型比这些学科带头人的研究落后了十年。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-23 21:29