楼主: xiaobeibei
2639 3

请教个模型选择的问题 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

初中生

47%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
847 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
167 点
帖子
16
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2005-11-17
最后登录
2008-4-11

楼主
xiaobeibei 发表于 2006-3-28 16:05:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

stata,FGLS回归

回归一:


Cross-sectional time-series FGLS regression

Coefficients: generalized least squares
Panels: homoskedastic
Correlation: no autocorrelation

Estimated covariances = 1 Number of obs = 700
Estimated autocorrelations = 0 Number of groups = 100
Estimated coefficients = 5 Time periods = 7
Wald chi2(4) = 1952.74
Log likelihood = -922.4935 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000


lnt Coef. Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]

lngdp .1039338 .0029807 34.87 0.000 .0980917 .1097759
lnd -.517205 .0736273 -7.02 0.000 -.6615118 -.3728982
apec .6718755 .104525 6.43 0.000 .4670104 .8767407
lu .5319582 .1361562 3.91 0.000 .265097 .7988194
_cons 21.47754 .6615924 32.46 0.000 20.18084 22.77424

回归二增加了两个变量:

Cross-sectional time-series FGLS regression

Coefficients: generalized least squares
Panels: homoskedastic
Correlation: no autocorrelation

Estimated covariances = 1 Number of obs = 700
Estimated autocorrelations = 0 Number of groups = 100
Estimated coefficients = 7 Time periods = 7
Wald chi2(6) = 2389.42
Log likelihood = -869.1573 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000


lnt Coef. Std. Err. z P>z [95% Conf. Interval]

lngdp .098699 .0028182 35.02 0.000 .0931755 .1042225
lnd -.5550855 .0688252 -8.07 0.000 -.6899805 -.4201906
apec .6710518 .0973144 6.90 0.000 .4803192 .8617844
lu .5567073 .1265311 4.40 0.000 .3087109 .8047036
wto .3978175 .0839592 4.74 0.000 .2332604 .5623745
wtoc .6132775 .0644065 9.52 0.000 .4870431 .739512
_cons 21.3736 .6140994 34.80 0.000 20.16999 22.57721

请教如何判断,

是否回归二要更好一些?

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:模型选择 coefficients correlations correlation coefficient 请教 模型 选择

回帖推荐

bigdog_1 发表于3楼  查看完整内容

since the model 2 has two more variables than model 1, this is a comparision of nested models, which should use F-test. You can treat model one as a restricted model of model two, the restrictions are b5=0 and b6=0 The unrestricted model is always better than restricted model. (see Greene 2002) "The fit of the restricted least squares coefficients cannot be better than that of the unrestricted ...

bigdog_1 发表于2楼  查看完整内容

Basicly, it is hard to say which model is better. if you add two variables, you will take the risk of missing specification. So first of all, the choosing of variables should base on theories or the empirical results of other guys. If you only want to compare two nonnested models, you can try Cox test or J test.

本帖被以下文库推荐

沙发
bigdog_1 发表于 2006-3-29 04:17:00

Using cox or J test to compare two nonnested models

Basicly, it is hard to say which model is better. if you add two variables, you  will take the risk of missing specification. So first of all, the choosing of variables should base on theories or the empirical results of other guys. If you only want to compare two nonnested models, you can try Cox test or J test.
已有 1 人评分经验 论坛币 收起 理由
胖胖小龟宝 + 20 + 20 热心帮助其他会员

总评分: 经验 + 20  论坛币 + 20   查看全部评分

藤椅
bigdog_1 发表于 2006-3-29 12:44:00

Sorry, you can use F test in your case

since the model 2 has two more variables than model 1, this is a comparision of nested models, which should use F-test.

You can treat model one as a restricted model of model two, the restrictions are b5=0 and b6=0

The unrestricted model is always better than restricted model. (see Greene 2002)

"The fit of the restricted least squares coefficients cannot be better than that of the unrestricted solution" (Greene 2002 p101)

But you can use F test to test whether restricted model is statatisticlly not difference with the unrestricted model.

H0: b5=0, b6=0

H1:

If rejected H0, choosing unrestricted model

if do not reject H0, choosing restricted model

Test statistic sees Greene 2002 p102(Fifth Version )

One more thing, this test assumes that disturbances follow normal distribution.

板凳
xiaobeibei 发表于 2006-3-29 14:48:00
Thanks

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 02:19