楼主: regain2000
1380 0

[其他] 菜鸟求助,这个结果为什么是这样分析的? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

高级会员

已卖:23份资源

博士生

78%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
5404 个
通用积分
0.1200
学术水平
10 点
热心指数
25 点
信用等级
17 点
经验
12888 点
帖子
239
精华
0
在线时间
374 小时
注册时间
2009-6-27
最后登录
2021-7-10

楼主
regain2000 发表于 2010-5-16 12:38:51 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
在阅读一篇文章的数据分析时,所得结果如附件所示。

文中这样写道“Table 2 shows the results of the analyses predicting the reputation effects of the various facets of a firm’s market actions. Hypothesis 1 argues
that a firm’s total market actions will positively affect its reputation. Model 1 demonstrates support for Hypothesis 1 at the p< 0.05 level. According to Hypothesis 2 the complexity in a
firm’s action repertoire has a positive effect on a firm’s reputation. The positive coefficient for the repertoire complexity variable is significant at the p< 0.05 level in Model 1 and provides
support for Hypothesis 2. Testing for the moderating effect of industry concentration on these variables in Model 2 and Model 3, we find that the interaction of total actions and industry concentration is not significant. Hypothesis 3a is therefore not supported. In contrast, the interaction effect between repertoire complexity and industry concentration is significant at the p< 0.05 level, supporting Hypothesis 3b.

求助各位大侠,这个结果为什么是这样分析的?

多谢~~~
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:interaction HYPOTHESIS Reputation Complexity predicting complexity reputation positive support action

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jltj
拉您入交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-2 14:05