楼主: 经贸合作894
437 0

[英文文献] Building Micro-Foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance ... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
经贸合作894 发表于 2005-1-4 14:57:54 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Building Micro-Foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links-为例程、功能和性能链接构建微观基础
英文文献作者:Peter Abell,Teppo Felin,Nicolai Foss
英文文献摘要:
Micro-foundations have become an important emerging theme in strategic management. This paper addresses micro-foundations in two related ways. First, we argue that the kind of macro (or “collectivist”) explanation that is utilized in the capabilities view in strategic management ? which implies a neglect of micro-foundations ? is incomplete. There are no mechanisms that work solely on the macro-level, directly connecting routines and capabilities to firm-level outcomes. While routines and capabilities are useful shorthand for complicated patterns of individual action and interaction, ultimately they are best understood at the micro-level. Second, we provide a formal model that shows precisely why macro explanation is incomplete and which exemplifies how explicit micro-foundations may be built for notions of routines and capabilities and for how these impact firm performance.

微观基础已经成为战略管理中一个重要的新兴主题。本文以两种相关的方式论述微观基础。首先,我们认为这种宏观(或“集体主义”)的解释,在战略管理的能力视图中使用?这意味着忽视了微观基础?是不完整的。没有一种机制只在宏观层面起作用,直接将日常事务和能力与公司层面的结果联系起来。虽然例程和功能是对复杂的个体行为和交互模式的有用速记,但最终它们最好还是在微观层次上被理解。其次,我们提供了一个正式的模型,精确地展示了为什么宏观解释是不完整的,并举例说明了如何为常规和能力的概念建立明确的微观基础,以及这些概念如何影响企业绩效。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 05:28