楼主: linzhang219
2904 4

[CFA考试] 注意:最新的评分标准(zz) [推广有奖]

  • 10关注
  • 0粉丝

已卖:593份资源

博士生

29%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
1035 个
通用积分
0.2400
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
280 点
帖子
210
精华
0
在线时间
280 小时
注册时间
2010-5-31
最后登录
2018-11-16

楼主
linzhang219 发表于 2010-6-8 09:01:44 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
不晓得这样是不是真的变难了。。。



How Do They Determine A Passing Score on The CFA Exams? Since the CFA June exams are now done, there's a lot of concern as to how CFAI determines a passing score. So, here's a breakdown for Levels 1 and 2:

In the past CFAI used a strictly numeric method of calculating the pass rate - they'd take 70% of the 95th percentile score. So, back in the day, the minimum passing score would be no greater than 70%, and would typically be even less.

Now, their scoring system has a significant subjective component to it. Here's how it works: CFA Institute brings a number of charterholders that they call "Standard Setters" to Charlotte sometime in June. These people then discuss what they think a "minimally qualified" candidate should know (for L1 and L2). CFAI is pretty opaque as to what this actually means, but my understanding is that they look at the exams and come up with "the score".

They refer to what's know as the "Angoff method". If they apply this method in its strictest sense, this would involve each standard setter examining each question and making a subjective determination as to what percentage of well-qualified candidates would answer correctly on the question. For each question, the standard-setters percentages are averaged to get a percentage for that question. The individual question-percentages are then summed to get the passing score (in terms of number of correct answers needed).

So theoretically, the minimum passing score could be above 70%. But according to the scuttlebut on analyst forum, the minimum has likely been below 70% in each year. So, my gut reaction is that a 70% would get it done, and even slightly less.

But that's just a guess on my part.

Note: If you're new to Financial Rounds, check out our FAQ. If you want to receive updates, either sign up for email updates on the right sidebar, or add our RSS feed to your feed reader.


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:最新的 significant Theoretical Calculating percentage 评分

沙发
warrenzhang 发表于 2010-6-8 09:34:33
希望charterholder们放放水.

藤椅
linzhang219 发表于 2010-6-8 09:37:08
同希望啊!!

板凳
082015115 发表于 2010-6-8 14:19:25
楼主从哪里转载的呀?分享下原始链接吧,个人觉得这段评论也是一家之言
顶起来,大家都来讨论下吧。

报纸
linzhang219 发表于 2010-6-8 16:11:56
原始链接没有记下,是bbs.cfaspace.com里面的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-5 18:04