楼主: 正当竞争626
380 0

[英文文献] Food Access, Food Deserts, and the Women, Infants, and Children Program [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
正当竞争626 发表于 2006-4-18 01:10:05 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Food Access, Food Deserts, and the Women, Infants, and Children Program
英文文献作者:Wu, Qi,Saitone, Tina L.,Sexton, Richard J.
英文文献摘要:
This paper examines the effects of food deserts in the Greater Los Angeles area on the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program participants’ shopping behavior. Research on WIC program cost containment shows that costs are significantly higher at small, convenience-type vendors compared to supermarkets. However, to address the concern that stopping authorizing these small vendors or restricting their pricing practices could limit food access for participants living in food deserts, we use various approaches to study the WIC purchasing behavior of participants located in food deserts relative to a control group of participants located in non food-desert areas. Our results indicate that food-desert status has a positive effect on participants’ travel distance to shop. Food-desert participants were slightly more likely to visit multiple vendors than non-food-desert counterparts. Food-desert participants were also slightly more likely to visit a large vendor than non-food-desert counterparts. On balance we conclude that food-desert participants are not more reliant on small vendors to make WIC purchases than participants in the control group. This result suggests policies to restrict behavior high-cost small vendors can be implemented by WIC agencies without causing much impact on participant access.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-31 08:01