楼主: 收支相抵887
367 0

[英文文献] Who Benefits Most from SNAP? [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-22
最后登录
2020-9-22

楼主
收支相抵887 发表于 2006-4-18 09:03:56 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Who Benefits Most from SNAP?
英文文献作者:Gregory, Christian,Deb, Partha
英文文献摘要:
Empirical methods for estimating the treatment effects of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) routinely focus on the average treatment effect of the program. This statistic is satisfactory and useful for many policy makers, although researchers understand that it is unlikely that program effects are constant across the treatment population. Obviously, differences in treatment across observed household, individual or geographic characteristics could lead to heterogeneous outcomes. And there are good reasons to think that effects of treatment will vary across \textit{unobserved} factors in household: food preferences, subjective poverty thresholds, discount rates, and financial acumen all could affect the distribution of outcomes not captured in the mean treatment effect. We estimate finite mixture models in order to address heterogeneity in response to receipt of SNAP and find that the data suggests two latent classes of recipients: one for whom SNAP has little or no effect, and one for whom SNAP has large and significant effects. This is true for both of the outcomes that we examine: food spending and food insecurity.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-2-18 02:52