楼主: 货币285
366 0

[英文文献] Localised Low-tech Learning in the Furniture Industry-在家具行业学习本地化的低技术 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
货币285 发表于 2005-1-8 20:59:45 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Localised Low-tech Learning in the Furniture Industry-在家具行业学习本地化的低技术
英文文献作者:Peter Maskell
英文文献摘要:
It is by now an established fact, that the so-called high technology industries have experienced growth rates way above average through most years. High technology industries share of the world manufacturers export has risen from 12 per cent in 1970 to 25 per cent in 1995. More than one-third of Japan's manufacturing export and more than 40 per cent of America's manufacturing export are products from high technology industries, and this development has increasingly led to an international obsession with high technology industries. In a number of countries R&D indicators have by now become the object of intense discussions. Great efforts are devoted to improve a bad relative standing. The aim of this paper is to questioned whether a national specialisation towards high technology industries is the only way by which the mature, developed countries can hope to sustain and augment their economic position. I claim that in contrast to much of the assumptions in contemporary politics and in the majority of the contemporary academic literature on the subject the countries without a specialisation in high technology industries are not left in the backwaters of economic development. Quite the contrary seems to be the case as many advanced, high-cost countries experience an above average economic performance even when specialising in the bottom end of the low-tech industries. The argument is illustrated with empirical material from the wooden furniture industry in general - and the rather successful Danish wooden furniture industry in particular. The possible reasons behind this apparent paradox are discussed.

到目前为止,所谓的高科技产业的增长率在大多数年份都远高于平均水平,这已是一个公认的事实。高技术工业在世界制造商出口中所占的份额已从1970年的12%上升到1995年的25%。在日本逾三分之一的制造业出口和美国逾40%的制造业出口中,都是来自高科技产业的产品,而这种发展已日益导致国际社会对高科技产业的痴迷。在许多国家,研发指标目前已成为激烈讨论的对象。为了改善不良的相对地位,他们付出了巨大的努力。这篇论文的目的是质疑国家对高技术产业的专业化是否是成熟的发达国家能够希望维持和增强其经济地位的唯一途径。我断言,与当代政治和大多数当代学术文献中关于这一主题的假设相反,那些在高技术行业没有专业化的国家并没有被遗弃在经济发展的死水之中。事实似乎恰恰相反,许多发达、高成本国家的经济表现高于平均水平,即使它们专门从事低技术产业的低端。这个论点用来自木制家具行业的经验材料来说明,尤其是相当成功的丹麦木制家具行业。本文讨论了这一明显矛盾背后的可能原因。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 15:43