个人关于动态规划及高级宏观学习的意见

firevenus 发表于 2011-11-30 16:15
望鲁兄再接再厉，百尺竿头，更进一步。

谢谢您的关注、鼓励和好评，然而，我实在受之有愧。
希望我们日后多交流，多学习。

鲁峰 发表于 2010-9-30 21:36
《动态优化》一书我有电子版，你把邮箱留下，我发给你好了。 8# Dragic

请问您能将《动态优化》的电子版发给我吗？谢谢！taway@foxmail.com

牛人！

对于没有多少数学基础的人来说，先看谁的高宏教材好呢？

鲁峰 发表于 2010-10-9 22:34
你好，《动态优化》一书已经用邮件发给你了。查收！ 13# liangxd

"鲁峰"大哥，你好！我是经济学学生，菜鸟级的。不过对经济学有兴趣，能否也发个《动态优化》给我？我的邮箱是microsam@163.com。谢谢哈！

为什么不搜索一下呢
就是这本
https://bbs.pinggu.org/forum.php? ... amic%2BOptimization

希望跟大家多多交流吧。

多谢楼主的分享了很好的学习经验，顺便问下，楼主能将《动态优化》的电子版发给我吗？谢谢！postcam@sohu.com

你好，能否也给我发一个《动态优化》，多谢！yizi55555@163.com

I can't agree with you, even the econ phd program at University of Minnesota use Stokey, Lucas & Prescott, 1989 as the primary textbook. As soon as you get used to the language of that book, it is not that hard as your first glance, and on the same time, those tricky maths are really important for macroeconomic research, especially for truly understanding about the model, why the model has a solution, and so on. I hold the same view as you before, but after taking Chari's course on Macro, I realized that this is the most efficient (despite somewhat a torture) way to build up my analytical sense. Read a lot of stuff before going into the core a subject really isn't a good way to start, and sometimes it is totally a waste of time, you may enjoy what you do, but it may be biased, that is my personal experience, anyway.
On the other hand, for reading RMT, I found that some sense in time series analysis is important, and Hamilton, 1989 is certainly a important reference for this field.