楼主: wenO6ZTcp8ct6
533 0

[英文文献] Are short rotation coppices an alternative to traditional agricultural land... [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

已卖:29份资源

初中生

95%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
510 个
通用积分
93.0717
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
330 点
帖子
11
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-16
最后登录
2020-9-16

楼主
wenO6ZTcp8ct6 发表于 2006-6-10 11:41:55 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:Are short rotation coppices an alternative to traditional agricultural land use in Germany? A real options approach
英文文献作者:Haverkamp, Matthias Wolbert,Musshoff, Oliver
英文文献摘要:
Short rotation coppice (SRC) is an interesting economic alternative to agricultural land use. Nevertheless, farmers often do not switch to SRC. Thus, it seems like the farmers do not act according to the classical investment theory. A relatively new approach which can help to explain farmers’ reluctance is the real options approach (ROA). Compared to the classical investment theory, the investment triggers are shifted upwards. We want to answer the question of whether the ROA is an explanatory approach for farmers’ reluctance to invest in SRC. To do so, we develop a model to calculate the investment triggers of the gross margins (GM) of SRC a farmer should switch from rye production to SRC. The results show that the trigger GMs calculated according to the ROA are higher than those of the net present value and a risk-averse farmer invests earlier than a risk-neutral farmer. It can be concluded that a part of famers’ reluctance concerning SRC can be explained by the ROA.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-14 08:13