发帖
雷达卡
有哪位仁兄看过In or out:efficient inclusion of installations in an emissions trading scheme?看过这篇文章？这个应该怎样翻译？
Abstract Regulators around the world are currently considering national emissions trading schemes(ETS)as cost-effective instruments to reduce greenhouse gas emis-
sions.In the process,they are confronted with numerous design issues.The coverage of installations in an ETS is one such issue.While“blanket coverage”that includes all
industrial emitters of greenhouse gases in an economy has some intuitive appeal,and seems equitable,it does not take into full account all the costs related to the extent of
coverage.This paper shows that an alternative approach of“partial coverage”based on benefit–cost analysis can achieve the same emission reduction outcome at lower
social cost.The approach is based on maximizing the benefits from inclusion of instal-lations in an ETS at the same time as taking all relevant transaction costs into account.
A broad definition of transaction costs is used,which covers the regulatory costs to the government as well as regulatory costs imposed on covered installations.We find
that particularly for relatively modest emissions reduction targets the cost savings of a“partial coverage”compared to“blanket coverage”are significant.
Keywords Emissions trading scheme·Environmental policy·Installation coverage·Transaction costs
京公网安备 11010802022788号
