What does Hillary stand for? Hillary Clinton in 2016 On April 4, The Economist published an article named “ What does Hillary stand for? Hillary Clinton in 2016 ”. Mrs Clinton has had her eye on the top job—president for a long time. In 2008, She nearly won it in 2008 and is in many ways a stronger candidate now. Thegame isriggedbybigmoney. She has built a vast campaign machine, of course, with her husband, the former president. The moment Mrs Clinton turns the key, it will begin openly to suck up contributions, spit out sound bites and roll over her rivals. There is a bitter irony. What we most care about is : what does Hillary stand for? After all, it is a big news this week and this article is at least the cover story. According to her supporters, she flew nearly a million miles and visited 112 countries. If a foreign crisis occurs on her watch, she will already have been there, read the briefing book and had tea with the local power brokers. No other candidate of either party can boast as much. From this case, we know that she has lots of political capital on the surface at least. She also understands Washington, DC, as well as anyone. Mrs Clinton made a habit of listening to, and working with, senators on both sides of the aisle, leading some Republicans publicly to regret having disliked her in the past. On foreign policy, she says she is neither a realist nor an idealist but an "idealistic realist". Charles Schumer, her former Senate colleague from New York, called her "the most opaque person you'll ever meet in your life". On foreign policy, Mrs Clinton's pitch is that she would be tougher than Mr Obama . Many foreigners would welcome an American commander-in-chief who is genuinely engaged with the world outside America. Sceptics raise two further worries about Mrs Clinton . She used a private server for her e-mails as secretary of state, released only the ones she deemed relevant and then deleted the rest. Some people think she is untrustworthy. The other worry, as Gary Hart said, "We should not be down to two families who are qualified to govern." Will Hillary Clinton win in 2016? This article provides us with too much information about disadvantages about her, although it looks like appreciating Mrs Clinton in some degree. Firstly, as we all know, she has spent years in politics so she make acquaintances with many politicians. But this will let people concentrate on family political instead of the first female president . Obama is America's first black president and the news cheered many people up in the past, but it means nothing. Pr stunt about the first female president may let people be repulsive. Secondly, she does not have clear repulsive. As put above, Mrs Clinton is close to Wall Street, but she is also a power-hungry statist. Giving both sides a stake in change is a good strategy to be a politicians, but to be voted as a president, it means you offend both parties. It has a negative effect on some voters, especially them who are in swing states. They will be puzzled and do not support you. Thirdly, sometimes something is a trend. To a certain extent, maybe she is too old to be a president, just younger than Reagan. As a democratic president, what Mr Obama does is unimpressive. Many foreigners would welcome an American commander-in-chief who is genuinely engaged with the world outside American, but not American people. There are too much unpredictable venture during her way to be president. What happens after that remains to be seen .
WHEN Vladimir Putin plays host to Barack Obama and other world leaders at the G20 summit in St Petersburg next week, mutual resentment and dislike will be ill-concealed. The American president recently likened the Russian leader’s body language to that of a “bored kid in the back of the classroom” . Mr Obama has cancelled a planned bilateral meeting in Moscow, choosing to visit Sweden instead. The last straw was Russia’s sheltering of Edward Snowden, a fugitive American spook. But the spat over that only crystallised something apparent since Mr Putin returned to the Kremlin in 2012: that the “reset”, launched with much fanfare in 2009, is not just dying, but dead. http://www.economist.com/news/europe/21584339-relations-europe-and-america-freeze-over-vladimir-putin-looks-china-cold-climate
Dear Class of 2012: 致2012年毕业的你。 Allow me to be the first one not to congratulate you. Through exertions that—let's be honest—were probably less than heroic, most of you have spent the last few years getting inflated grades in useless subjects in order to obtain a debased degree. Now you're entering a lousy economy, courtesy of the very president whom you, as freshmen, voted for with such enthusiasm. Please spare us the self-pity about how tough it is to look for a job while living with your parents. They're the ones who spent a fortune on your education only to get you back— return-to-sender, forwarding address unknown. 请允许我成为第一个不对你说“恭喜”的人。在过去几年中，你们中的大多数努力地在各种并不实用的课程中为了一个看得过去的成绩而徘徊奋斗。这并不是什么值得夸耀的事情，你懂的。现在在这糟糕的，拜你们大一时投票选出的总统所赐的经济环境下，你们要离开学校了。重新回到父母的家中住下，并同时开始寻找并不好找的工作不是一件容易的事儿。毕竟你的父母是曾经在你身上给予厚望，而他们现在更像是拿着没能寄出去的邮包的发件人，且无从得知这个邮包接下来该往哪儿发去。 No doubt some of you have overcome real hardships or taken real degrees. A couple of years ago I hired a summer intern from West Point. She came to the office directly from weeks of field exercises in which she kept a bulletproof vest on at all times, even while sleeping. She writes brilliantly and is as self-effacing as she is accomplished. Now she's in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban. 你们中的某些当然还是经历了严峻的考验获得了真才实学的。几年前我曾经招了一个来自西点军校的实习生。她开始工作前刚完成了一个长达数周的训练项目，在这个项目里她甚至连睡觉的时候都得穿着防弹背心。她的文笔十分的好，而且格外谦虚。现在的她正在阿富汗对抗恐怖分子。 If you're like that intern, please feel free to feel sorry for yourself. Just remember she doesn't. 如果你也像那个实习生一样，你有权利对你的生活觉得不满。但请记住，她从来没有那么想过。 Unfortunately, dear graduates, chances are you're nothing like her. And since you're no longer children, at least officially, it's time someone tells you the facts of life. The other facts. 但是亲爱的毕业生们，也许你们远没有达到她的成就。你们已然不是小孩儿了，至少现在有人该告诉你一些关于人生的实情了： Fact One is that, in our "knowledge-based" economy, knowledge counts. Yet here you are, probably the least knowledgeable graduating class in history. 首先要说的是，在这个知识决定命运的经济环境中，知识依然是很受重视的。但可惜你们也许是这么多年来最缺乏知识的一届毕业生。 A few months ago, I interviewed a young man with an astonishingly high GPA from an Ivy League university and aspirations to write about Middle East politics. We got on the subject of the Suez Crisis of 1956. He was vaguely familiar with it. But he didn't know who was president of the United States in 1956. And he didn't know who succeeded that president. 几个月前，我面试了一个从常春藤盟校毕业，有一个高得令人发指的GPA的男生。他想写作关于中东政治方面的文章，于是我们开始谈论1956年的苏伊士运河危机（第二次中东战争）。他只是大概知道这桩历史事件，但完全不了解谁是当时的美国总统（美国与苏联的介入是战争最终结束的主因），以及他的继任者是谁。 Pop quiz, Class of '12: Do you? 你知道那是谁吗毕业生们？（我觉得大多数还是应该知道1956年中国的国家领导人是谁的。。） Many of you have been reared on the cliché that the purpose of education isn't to stuff your head with facts but to teach you how to think. Wrong. I routinely interview college students, mostly from top schools, and I notice that their brains are like old maps, with lots of blank spaces for the uncharted terrain. It's not that they lack for motivation or IQ. It's that they can't connect the dots when they don't know where the dots are in the first place. 人们一直说教育的目的不是灌输式地记忆，而是学习如何思考。不管你信不信，反正我是不信的。在我长期面试在校生的印象中，我发觉许多面试者的思维就像古旧的地图一般，有许多区域是因为没有认知而空白着的。很多情况下我觉得他们并不是缺乏智商，而是在于当他们根本不知道知识从何而来的时候，无法建立知识与知识间的联系。 Now to Fact Two: Your competition is global. Shape up. Don't end your days like a man I met a few weeks ago in Florida, complaining that Richard Nixon had caused his New York City business to fail by opening up China. 现在让我们来谈谈第二桩事实 – 你们所面对的竞争是国际化的。努力吧，别像我前两天在佛罗里达所遇到的那个商人一样，在你的余生中抱怨是尼克松总统对中国开放的政策悔了他曾经在纽约的业务。 In places like Ireland, France, India and Spain, your most talented and ambitious peers are graduating into economies even more depressed than America's. Unlike you, they probably speak several languages. They may also have a degree in a hard science or engineering—skills that transfer easily to the more remunerative jobs in investment banks or global consultancies. 在像爱尔兰，法国，印度和西班牙这样的地方，你们不乏天赋与目标的同龄人正在一个更糟糕的经济环境中毕业。与你们不同的是，他们也许会说许多种语言，并拥有一个科学或工程方面的学位。他们的能力或许更容易帮助他们找到一份薪酬丰厚的类似于投行或咨询业的工作。 I know a lot of people like this from my neighborhood in New York City, and it's a good thing they're so well-mannered because otherwise they'd be eating our lunch. But if things continue as they are, they might soon be eating yours. 在我在纽约工作的地方附近，有许多这样的人。万幸他们仍然保持着应有的礼节从而我们并没有感受到来自他们的压力。然而如果经济环境继续这么发展下去，也许他们马上就会开始抢你们的饭碗了。 Which reminds me of Fact Three: Your prospective employers can smell BS from miles away. And most of you don't even know how badly you stink. 这让我联想起了我想说的第三桩事情：你潜在的雇主对于夸夸其谈的想法早有察觉，并能笑而不语，而你们中的许多甚至不知道你们的想法有多不切实际。 When did puffery become the American way? Probably around the time Norman Mailer came out with "Advertisements for Myself." But at least that was in the service of provoking an establishment that liked to cultivate an ideal of emotional restraint and public reserve. 从什么时候起连美国人也开始靠吹牛而活了？也许是始于诺曼·梅勒的《给自己的广告》（1959年发行的一本文集）？但至少那本书是为了动员人们培养个人节操以及参与社会公益活动。 To read through your CVs, dear graduates, is to be assaulted by endless Advertisements for Myself. Here you are, 21 or 22 years old, claiming to have accomplished feats in past summer internships or at your school newspaper that would be hard to credit in a biography of Walter Lippmann or Ernie Pyle. 毕业生们，当我阅读你们的简历时，我所看见的只是无穷无尽的“给自己的广告”。你们在21、22岁是所完成的一切，不管来自你上个夏天的实习或是在学校校报的工作，甚至已经超出沃尔特·李普曼和厄尼·派尔（均为非常有名的作家，普利策奖得主）在他们自传中对他们自己的描述了。 If you're not too bright, you may think this kind of nonsense goes undetected; if you're a little brighter, you probably figure everyone does it so you must as well. 也许你愚蠢地认为这种吹嘘并不会为人们所发觉，或者你自作聪明地认为既然大家都在这么做你也必须从众一下。 But the best of you don't do this kind of thing at all. You have an innate sense of modesty. You're confident that your résumé needs no embellishment. You understand that less is more. 但是你真实的自我绝不会做这样的事情的。每个人的内在都曾是谦逊的。当你了解什么叫做“更少才是更多”的时候，你就会有不过分在简历中标榜的自信了。 In other words, you're probably capable of thinking for yourself. And here's Fact Four: There will always be a market for people who can do that. 从另一个角度说，你也许有自我思考的能力。这是我想说的第四件事情：对于能自我思考的人而言，市场的需求永远存在。 In every generation there's a strong tendency for everyone to think like everyone else. But your generation has an especially bad case, because your mass conformism is masked by the appearance of mass nonconformism. It's a point I learned from my West Point intern, when I asked her what it was like to lead such a uniformed existence. Her answer stayed with me: Wearing a uniform, she said, helped her figure out what it was that really distinguished her as an individual. 对于每一代人而言，人云亦云的问题是很普遍的。但对于你们这代人来说，这个问题尤其严重，因为你们的大量的从众行为大多带上了不走寻常路的伪装。这是我与我西点军校的实习生聊到她带领规定练习的经验时所学到的。 她的回答让我印象深刻。她当时对我说“穿着统一的制服，反而让她理解到什么才是真正区别她自己与其他人的本质。” Now she's a second lieutenant, leading a life of meaning and honor, figuring out how to Think Different for the sake of a cause that counts. Not many of you will be able to follow in her precise footsteps, nor do you need to do so. But if you can just manage to tone down your egos, shape up your minds, and think unfashionable thoughts, you just might be able to do something worthy with your lives. And even get a job. Good luck! 现在她已经是一个有着对生活的理想和荣耀的少尉了，而且她有对自己生活意义的独到见解。你们中也许没几个人能完全像她一样这么一步一步走过去。当然你们完全没有必要跟随别人的足迹，但是如果你能够放下自我中心的想法，多独立思考，也许在你的生命中你能够做出些不枉此生的事情。或许甚至找到一份工作。加油吧！ Write to bstephens@wsj.com 作者：布雷特·斯蒂芬斯。华尔街时报专栏作家
标签: President经管大学堂：名校名师名课
京公网安备 11010802022788号
论坛法律顾问：王进律师
知识产权保护声明
免责及隐私声明
