tag 标签: Trump经管大学堂:名校名师名课

相关帖子

版块 作者 回复/查看 最后发表
华尔街日报:川普30年前写就的竞选宝典《交易的艺术》_wallstreet journal attach_img 金融学(理论版) wwqqer 2016-3-5 88 20050 OSTINACM666 2025-6-6 13:51:39
【独家发布】【朝花夕拾-好文共赏047】-為什麼最好的預測者有時也會失算? 真实世界经济学(含财经时事) fumingxu 2016-7-31 1 746 h2h2 2016-8-2 06:17:20
Mike Pence, the socially conservative governor of Indiana, is Trump’s running m 外语学习 晓七 2016-7-17 0 1111 晓七 2016-7-17 03:31:42
Political Data Science: Analyzing Trump LATEX论坛 oliyiyi 2016-6-26 0 1307 oliyiyi 2016-6-26 17:59:18
奥巴马:呼吁慎重投票给特朗普 世界经济与国际贸易 zll6303 2016-5-7 2 1324 zll6303 2016-5-7 20:11:17
Trump Pins Rally Chaos on Sanders's Supporters, Defends Own 休闲灌水 zhougerr 2016-3-13 0 958 zhougerr 2016-3-13 20:31:00
【独家发布】【2015】The Emotional Politics of Racism attach_img 管理科学与工程 kychan 2015-12-10 21 3224 kuayueriguang 2016-1-3 00:29:59
悬赏 When Does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work - [!reward_solved!] attachment 求助成功区 阿狸与桃子 2015-12-10 1 790 xiaoduan154 2015-12-10 11:33:17
Trump University Real Estate 101: Building Wealth With Real Estate Investments attachment 金融实务版 nelsoncwlee 2015-7-31 0 1095 nelsoncwlee 2015-7-31 15:26:54
Trump University 101 Series(most powerful and important ideas in business) attachment MBA专版 mumu7656 2010-5-10 6 2220 Zubang 2012-11-21 13:53:19
Trump Strategies for Real Estate: Billionaire Lessons for the Small Investor attachment 金融学(理论版) smboys 2011-12-15 1 1420 RJ1988 2011-12-20 11:48:06
KGI-中国风电行业Long-term positives trump near-term negatives- 080905.p19 attachment 行业分析报告 gdx456 2008-9-14 2 2834 谢正干 2010-12-28 17:11:23
[下载]TRUMP Strategies for Real Estate attachment 金融学(理论版) fionawu 2009-2-13 1 1892 robert8220 2009-2-13 19:27:00
[下载][推荐]Finance.Investment.-.Trump.Strategies.for.Real.Estate attachment 金融学(理论版) yangwenyu 2008-9-25 0 1794 yangwenyu 2008-9-25 06:41:00

相关日志

分享 Trump By A Landslide?
insight 2016-8-30 10:57
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-29/trump-landslide Trump By A Landslide? by Tyler Durden Aug 29, 2016 9:40 AM 2 SHARES Twitter Facebook Reddit Submitted by Charles Hugh-Smith via OfTwoMinds blog, Based on this analytic structure, Trump may not just win the election in November--he might win by a landslide. If we believe the mainstream media and the Establishment it protects and promotes, Trump has no chance of winning the presidential election. For starters, Trump supporters are all Confederate-flag waving hillbillies, bigots, fascists and misogynists. In other words. "good people" can't possibly vote for Trump. Even cartoon character Mike Doonesbury is fleeing to Vancouver to escape Trumpism. (Memo to the Doonesbury family: selling your Seattle home will barely net the down payment on a decent crib in Vancouver.) For another, Trump alienates the entire planet every time he speaks. The list goes on, of course, continuing with his lack of qualifications. But suppose this election isn't about Trump or Hillary at all. Suppose, as political scientists Allan J. Lichtman and Ken DeCell claimed in their 1988 book, Thirteen Keys to the Presidency , that all presidential elections from 1860 to the present are referendums on the sitting president and his party. If the public views the sitting president's second term favorably, the candidate from his party will win the election. If the public views the sitting president's second term unfavorably, the candidate from the other party will win the election. (Lichtman published another book on his system in 2008, The Keys to the White House: A Surefire Guide to Predicting the Next President .) Author/historian Robert W. Merry sorts through the 13 analytic keys in the current issue of The American Conservative magazine and concludes they "could pose bad news for Clinton." If five or fewer are negative for the incumbent, the incumbent party will win the election. If six or more are negative, the incumbent party loses the election. Merry counts eight negatives for President Obama's second term, which if true spells defeat for the Clinton ticket. Whether the 13 issues are positive or negative for the candidates is of course open to debate, but consider what it means that Trump won the Republican nomination despite the near-universal opposition of the Establishment. Consider that some polls found that 68 percent of adults think the country is on the wrong track and a recent average of six polls on the subject concluded that 64% of adults feel the nation is moving in the wrong direction . This means 2/3 of the nation's adults no longer buy into the Establishment/ mainstream media's narrative that the economy is expanding nicely, things are going in the right direction and Hillary Clinton has a lock on the presidency. Merry scored the economy as a positive for the incumbent party, but based on the public's view of where the nation is heading, I suspect the reality that the economy is weakening rapidly can no longer be hidden from the voting public. If we score the economy as a negative, that's nine negative keys for the incumbent party, well above the six minimum. Based on this analytic structure, Trump may not just win the election in November--he might win by a landslide --with landslide usually being defined by an overwhelming advantage in electoral college votes or 60% of the popular vote. As improbable as this may seem at the moment, consider the improbability of Trump capturing the Republican nomination. Consider the nature of Clinton's support: a mile wide (encompassing the entire Establishment) but only an inch deep. If the mainstream media has failed to persuade the American public that everything's going in the right direction, why should anyone remain confident that they can persuade the American pubic that Hillary will be their president come heck or high water? As I have noted before, there are very few ways left to stick your thumb in the eye of the elitist, predatory, self-serving Establishment that won't get you tossed in prison other than voting against their candidate , which in this election is Hillary Clinton. Memo to Clinton supporters : if you want to persuade the American public the nation is going in the right direction, you'll have to actually change the direction rather than just promise more of the same.
个人分类: politics|0 个评论
GMT+8, 2025-12-29 18:35