摘要翻译:
最好的气候政策是统一的碳税,并随着时间的推移逐步提高。公务员使气候政策复杂化,以扩大官僚机构,政治家创造租金。环保主义者夸大气候变化以获得影响力,其他活动家也加入了气候变化的潮流。气候政策的反对者抨击了气候研究的弱点。因此,气候辩论变得复杂和两极分化,气候政策也变得复杂。随着《巴黎协定》将气候政策转向各国政府,气候政策应该变得更加容易和理性。不断变化的政治优先事项、紧缩政策和日益成熟的官僚机构应该会导致一场更具建设性的气候辩论。
---
英文标题:
《The structure of the climate debate》
---
作者:
Richard S.J. Tol
---
最新提交年份:
2016
---
分类信息:
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:Economics 经济学
分类描述:q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学,包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--
一级分类:Economics 经济学
二级分类:Econometrics 计量经济学
分类描述:Econometric Theory, Micro-Econometrics, Macro-Econometrics, Empirical Content of Economic Relations discovered via New Methods, Methodological Aspects of the Application of Statistical Inference to Economic Data.
计量经济学理论,微观计量经济学,宏观计量经济学,通过新方法发现的经济关系的实证内容,统计推论应用于经济数据的方法论方面。
--
一级分类:Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类:General Finance 一般财务
分类描述:Development of general quantitative methodologies with applications in finance
通用定量方法的发展及其在金融中的应用
--
---
英文摘要:
First-best climate policy is a uniform carbon tax which gradually rises over time. Civil servants have complicated climate policy to expand bureaucracies, politicians to create rents. Environmentalists have exaggerated climate change to gain influence, other activists have joined the climate bandwagon. Opponents to climate policy have attacked the weaknesses in climate research. The climate debate is convoluted and polarized as a result, and climate policy complex. Climate policy should become easier and more rational as the Paris Agreement has shifted climate policy back towards national governments. Changing political priorities, austerity, and a maturing bureaucracy should lead to a more constructive climate debate.
---
PDF链接:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.05597