发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
针对特定弱势失业者群体（即长期失业者）的雇用激励措施在多大程度上比一般性激励措施（没有明确目标）更有效，以增加目标群体的雇用人数？一般化的激励措施能够影响弱势群体的雇用吗？有针对性的政策是否有太重要的负面副作用而不能接受？尽管有大量关于雇佣补贴的文献，但这些问题仍未解决。我们试图回答这些问题，比较两种类似的招聘政策对意大利劳动力市场的影响，一种是面向目标群体的，另一种是一般化的。我们使用了工作合同的行政数据，以及反事实分析方法。有针对性的政策对弱势群体有积极而显著的影响，而广义政策对弱势群体的影响不显著。此外，我们得出结论，定向政策没有产生任何间接的负面影响。
---
英文标题：
《Long-Term Unemployed hirings: Should targeted or untargeted policies be
preferred?》
---
作者：
Alessandra Pasquini, Marco Centra, Guido Pellegrini (MEMOTEF
Department Sapienza University of Rome, INAPP, Scienze Sociali ed Eonomiche
Department Sapienza University of Rome)
---
最新提交年份：
2018
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Economics 经济学
二级分类：Econometrics 计量经济学
分类描述：Econometric Theory, Micro-Econometrics, Macro-Econometrics, Empirical Content of Economic Relations discovered via New Methods, Methodological Aspects of the Application of Statistical Inference to Economic Data.
计量经济学理论，微观计量经济学，宏观计量经济学，通过新方法发现的经济关系的实证内容，统计推论应用于经济数据的方法论方面。
--
一级分类：Statistics 统计学
二级分类：Applications 应用程序
分类描述：Biology, Education, Epidemiology, Engineering, Environmental Sciences, Medical, Physical Sciences, Quality Control, Social Sciences
生物学，教育学，流行病学，工程学，环境科学，医学，物理科学，质量控制，社会科学
--
---
英文摘要：
To what extent, hiring incentives targeting a specific group of vulnerable unemployed (i.e. long term unemployed) are more effective, with respect to generalised incentives (without a definite target), to increase hirings of the targeted group? Are generalized incentives able to influence hirings of the vulnerable group? Do targeted policies have negative side effects too important to accept them? Even though there is a huge literature on hiring subsidies, these questions remained unresolved. We tried to answer them, comparing the impact of two similar hiring policies, one oriented towards a target group and one generalised, implemented on the italian labour market. We used administrative data on job contracts, and counterfactual analysis methods. The targeted policy had a positive and significant impact, while the generalized policy didn't have a significant impact on the vulnerable group. Moreover, we concluded the targeted policy didn't have any indirect negative side effect.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.03343
京公网安备 11010802022788号
