非使用非市场的一种可能的替代性评价方法 生态系统服务价值

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

摘要翻译：
生态系统服务的非使用价值和非市场价值的货币化非常重要，特别是在环境成本效益分析、管理和环境影响评估领域。然而，由于诸如流行的条件估价法(CVM)等方法存在的偏差，估价估计的可靠性受到了批评。为了提供可供比较的替代估值结果，我们提出了使用一种结合基于事实的成本和或有偏好的方法来评估非使用和非市场价值的可能性，我们称之为价值分配法(VAM)。本文讨论了VAM的经济学原理，介绍了VAM的实施过程，分析了与VAM相关的假设和潜在的偏差，并通过广州的一个案例对VAM与CVM进行了比较。案例研究表明，VAM比CVM给出了更保守的估计，这可能是一个优点，因为CVM经常产生高估值。我们认为，这种方法至少可以作为CVM的一种参考替代方法，并可能特别有助于评估人类投资的生态系统（如恢复的生态系统、人造公园和农田）的生态系统服务的非使用和非市场价值。
---
英文标题：
《A possible alternative evaluation method for the non-use and nonmarket
  values of ecosystem services》
---
作者：
Shuyao Wu, Shuangcheng Li
---
最新提交年份：
2018
---
分类信息：

一级分类：Economics        经济学
二级分类：General Economics        一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance        数量金融学
二级分类：Economics        经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--

---
英文摘要：
  Monetization of the non-use and nonmarket values of ecosystem services is important especially in the areas of environmental cost-benefit analysis, management and environmental impact assessment. However, the reliability of valuation estimations has been criticized due to the biases that associated with methods like the popular contingent valuation method (CVM). In order to provide alternative valuation results for comparison purpose, we proposed the possibility of using a method that incorporates fact-based costs and contingent preferences for evaluating non-use and nonmarket values, which we referred to as value allotment method (VAM). In this paper, we discussed the economic principles of VAM, introduced the performing procedure, analyzed assumptions and potential biases that associated with the method and compared VAM with CVM through a case study in Guangzhou, China. The case study showed that the VAM gave more conservative estimates than the CVM, which could be a merit since CVM often generates overestimated values. We believe that this method can be used at least as a referential alternative to CVM and might be particularly useful in assessing the non-use and nonmarket values of ecosystem services from human-invested ecosystems, such as restored ecosystems, man-made parks and croplands.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.08376

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：生态系统 评价方法 非市场 Contribution Conservative associated 管理 environmental 成本 案例