发帖
雷达卡
摘要翻译：
本文分析了土耳其大学首次聘用科研助理的程序是否符合规章制度。我们从53所土耳其大学手工收集了2409份申请人数据，看看申请人是否按照土耳其高等教育委员会建议的规则进行排名。规则手册规定，申请人应根据其GPA、研究生考试成绩、学术考试成绩和外语技能成绩的加权平均值为基础的最终成绩进行排名。因此，研究助理的选择应该是一个公平的过程，每个申请人都根据客观的指标进行评估。然而，我们对数据的分析表明，申请人的最终分数几乎完全基于招聘机构进行的高度主观的学术考试。因此，申请人的GPA、标准化研究生考试成绩、标准化外语成绩在选拔过程中是无关紧要的，这使得选拔过程是一个非常不公平的过程，基于偏袒。
---
英文标题：
《Favoritism in Research Assistantship Selection in Turkish Academia》
---
作者：
Osman Gulseven
---
最新提交年份：
2020
---
分类信息：
一级分类：Economics 经济学
二级分类：General Economics 一般经济学
分类描述：General methodological, applied, and empirical contributions to economics.
对经济学的一般方法、应用和经验贡献。
--
一级分类：Quantitative Finance 数量金融学
二级分类：Economics 经济学
分类描述：q-fin.EC is an alias for econ.GN. Economics, including micro and macro economics, international economics, theory of the firm, labor economics, and other economic topics outside finance
q-fin.ec是econ.gn的别名。经济学，包括微观和宏观经济学、国际经济学、企业理论、劳动经济学和其他金融以外的经济专题
--
---
英文摘要：
This article analyzes the procedure for the initial employment of research assistants in Turkish universities to see if it complies with the rules and regulations. We manually collected 2409 applicant data from 53 Turkish universities to see if applicants are ranked according to the rules suggested by the Higher Education Council of Turkey. The rulebook states that applicants should be ranked according to a final score based on the weighted average of their GPA, graduate examination score, academic examination score, and foreign language skills score. Thus, the research assistant selection is supposed to be a fair process where each applicant is evaluated based on objective metrics. However, our analysis of data suggests that the final score of the applicants is almost entirely based on the highly subjective academic examination conducted by the hiring institution. Thus, the applicants GPA, standardized graduate examination score, standardized foreign language score are irrelevant in the selection process, making it a very unfair process based on favoritism.
---
PDF链接：
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.04060
京公网安备 11010802022788号
