|
I doubt that why the river has to listen to what the desert said. According to information asymmetrics, the desert might get some insider information that the river could become vapor in order to accross the desert. However, due to the Efficient Market Hypothesis(EMH), the reality in the desert shows that no any other river has tried to use this way to accross the desert. It means that 1,it might have great risk of doing this so other rivers failed to do that, or 2, it is completely a new information so the river is the only one who get the info.
In the firsr case, the desert should explain the detail of risk and return to the river as it has the fiduciary duty, otherwise, the river could report to regulator.
In the second case, the river should pay the desert for the insider information about how to accross the desert. Of course, the regulatior may investigate this "transaction", the river and the desert may get the punishment.
|