给迷失方向的经济学研究生的建议 (作者Ariel Rubinstein)

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

Q&A:  Experienced advice for “lost” graduate students in Economics  

    Ariel Rubinstein  

    Happy Hour, NYU, October 28th, 2011

   http://arielrubinstein.tau.ac.il/8QA.pdf

其中一些问题和回答有着特殊性，可能未必适合中国研究生。但其中有一段关于发表的论述值得思考：

  Q6.  My paper has just been rejected.  What should I do?

    I have a lot of experience with the mental state you must be in, so I have three pieces

of advice:

    a) Don't read the referee reports.  They are likely to depress you.  Even if they are

potentially useful, you are not in a state of mind to enjoy them.

    b) Find comfort with my motto: "A paper that has not been rejected should not be

published."

    But beware of the faulty logic in assuming that "every paper that has been rejected

should be published."

    c) If the report was really idiotic, do a service to the profession by following my

example and posting it on your website.   

    In 2000, I received a report from a very sharp editor of a "local Cambridge journal".  

My paper criticized hyperbolic discounting, which was becoming increasingly popular at

the time.  The editor wrote:  "There are certainly many smart things in the piece but... this

seems like a critique of the current approach which is right in many ways, but critiques ...

of existing research are best fit to more specialized outlets".  My posting of the letter was more significant than the paper itself...

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏7 回帖

关键词：Rubinstein 经济学研究生 经济学研究 Stein Ariel 中国研究生 experience reports 经济学 likely

他认为“一篇没有被拒过的稿子不应该被发表”，同时希望大家不要误解为“每篇被拒过的稿子都应该被发表”。

如果你收到的是一份“修改后重新提交”的审稿意见，那当然应该认真阅读并大致按照其意见修改（如果有一些意见不同意，可以做一定的争辩和回应）。但是如果收到一份拒稿意见，按照Rubinstein的说法暂时可以搁置。也许这是大牛的看法和做法，我们收到拒稿意见显然是会去读的，至少要知道为什么被拒、如何提高。

但有时候，确实审稿意见未必就是正确和有意义的，毕竟学界内部的分歧也会导致一篇好文章被拒。如果论文确实有重大缺陷，而且作者本人意识到了，那没有审稿意见也可以知道修改方向。可能，比较好的方法还是与老师同行多交流，看看是否能在投稿前解决一些基本问题。

a) Don't read the referee reports.  They are likely to depress you.  Even if they are
potentially useful, you are not in a state of mind to enjoy them.
    b) Find comfort with my motto: "A paper that has not been rejected should not be
published."
    But beware of the faulty logic in assuming that "every paper that has been rejected
should be published."
    c) If the report was really idiotic, do a service to the profession by following my
example and posting it on your website.  
观点有启发

拒稿的那些话我也是至少半年内不会看的

eiri 发表于 2011-11-23 08:18
拒稿的那些话我也是至少半年内不会看的

有你老大的名字，谁敢据稿。。

我看了一下 斗胆说两句 虽然有部分不适合中国学生 还是大部分还是比较值得借鉴的

倒是投稿这部分 中外差距更大 所以 个人建议把整篇都看看 当然在国外牛校的特别做理论的同学也可以看看VARIAN的

simpleeyelid 发表于 2011-11-25 00:51
我看了一下 斗胆说两句 虽然有部分不适合中国学生 还是大部分还是比较值得借鉴的

倒是投稿这部分 中外差 ...

能看全部当然更好啦。

投稿的情况是这样，中外差距大是一个方面——另一个方面，不是让大家也去把审稿人意见po到网上，而是要正确对待被拒。

夸克之一 发表于 2011-11-25 07:29
能看全部当然更好啦。

投稿的情况是这样，中外差距大是一个方面——另一个方面，不是让大家也去把审稿 ...

哎，说得是。

郁闷，回去头悬梁锥刺股

是英文的吧？

我们得好好学习！！写出高质量的文章！！