楼主: mu_lianzheng
2371 6

[财经英语角区] 20120514 Follow Me 368 CEOs: All the Way Up? [推广有奖]

VIP

已卖:13711份资源

院士

69%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
6
论坛币
470657 个
通用积分
39.0693
学术水平
1370 点
热心指数
1293 点
信用等级
1343 点
经验
70611 点
帖子
859
精华
24
在线时间
1408 小时
注册时间
2010-6-10
最后登录
2012-12-25

初级学术勋章 初级热心勋章 中级学术勋章 中级热心勋章 高级学术勋章 初级信用勋章 特级学术勋章 中级信用勋章 高级信用勋章 高级热心勋章 特级信用勋章

楼主
mu_lianzheng 发表于 2012-5-13 20:44:17 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
CEOs: All the Way Up?

When Liam McGee departed as president of Bank of America in August, his explanation was surprisingly straight up. Rather than cloaking his exit in the usual vague excuses, he came right out and said he was leaving “to pursue my goal of running a company.” Broadcasting his ambition was “very much my decision,” McGee says. Within two weeks, he was talking for the first time with the board of Hartford Financial Services Group, which named him CEO and chairman on September 29.

McGee says leaving without a position lined up gave him time to reflect on what kind of company he wanted to run. It also sent a clear message to the outside world about his aspirations. And McGee isn’t alone. In recent weeks the No.2 executives at Avon and American Express quit with the explanation that they were looking for a CEO post. As boards scrutinize succession plans in response to shareholder pressure, executives who don’t get the nod also may wish to move on. A turbulent business environment also has senior managers cautious of letting vague pronouncements cloud their reputations.


As the first signs of recovery begin to take hold, deputy chiefs may be more willing to make the jump without a net. In the third quarter, CEO turnover was down 23% from a year ago as nervous boards stuck with the leaders they had, according to Liberum Research. As the economy picks up, opportunities will abound for aspiring leaders.


The decision to quit a senior position to look for a better one is unconventional. For years executives and headhunters have adhered to the rule that the most attractive CEO candidates are the ones who must be poached. Says Korn/Ferry senior partner Dennis Carey:”I can’t think of a single search I’ve done where a board has not instructed me to look at sitting CEOs first.”


Those who jumped without a job haven’t always landed in top positions quickly. Ellen Marram quit as chief of Tropicana a decade age, saying she wanted to be a CEO. It was a year before she became head of a tiny Internet-based commodities exchange. Robert Willumstad left Citigroup in 2005 with ambitions to be a CEO. He finally took that post at a major financial institution three years later.

Many recruiters say the old disgrace is fading for top performers. The financial crisis has made it more acceptable to be between jobs or to leave a bad one. “The traditional rule was it’s safer to stay where you are, but that’s been fundamentally inverted,” says one headhunter. “The people who’ve been hurt the worst are those who’ve stayed too long.”







二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:follow CEO EOS LOW Way his him president running company

已有 4 人评分学术水平 热心指数 信用等级 收起 理由
happylife87 + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
zhdefei + 2 + 2 + 2 精彩帖子
cglee + 1 + 1 + 1 精彩帖子
whachel1976 + 3 + 3 + 3 精彩帖子

总评分: 学术水平 + 7  热心指数 + 7  信用等级 + 7   查看全部评分

coffee

沙发
儒风海韵 发表于 2012-5-13 20:46:16
第一次抢沙发,谢谢楼主的文章

藤椅
whachel1976 发表于 2012-5-14 09:56:02
According to Agent Theory, there are many papers arguing how to unite the interests of managers and shareholders and what form of governance is better for corporations in aiming of making more profits for shareholders. It is said that management likes to take high risks when making an investment decision as the risk will be shared between the managers and the shareholders, while the performance will mainly be attributed to the managers. I don't quite understand this, as managers' vital decisions have to be discussed before being put into effect by the general meeting of shareholders or the board of directors. In my mind, the managers' degree of freedom is constrained by shareholders, what they really do is to put decision into practice.
The goal of running a company, in my mind, means much freedom for the manager. And the unspoken words behind it are:" I feel I was constrained and I could not do at my best. I want more freedom for my talents."

板凳
cglee 发表于 2012-5-14 11:34:36
It seems that economic crisis also promotes the flow of senior executives by means of weakening their sense of security.

报纸
zhdefei 在职认证  发表于 2012-5-14 17:07:57
The CEO is the leader of the enterprise. We are more concerned with their salary.
努力就会有结果,要成功就得努力!!!

地板
happylife87 发表于 2012-5-14 23:14:23
The fexibility and moving is making it hard to keep standing still, and bad situations make more to leave and more to come.

7
ljwyz 在职认证  学生认证  发表于 2012-5-15 11:20:50
whachel1976 发表于 2012-5-14 09:56
According to Agent Theory, there are many papers arguing how to unite the interests of managers and  ...
Agent Theory, in its origin keeps an eye between the effort exercised by a worker and the wage offered by the employee to elicit such an effort. A CEO, though unlikely, can stay in his office, flirting with some blondes when nothing

Depends on what is so called “vital decision”. People may think board members know exactly what the crucial decision for their firms is, but actually they don’t. I heard, and read from researchers, the vital chip in CEO hands is staff decision. Basically, CEO can appoint its CFO, CIO, CTO, without approval of the board (they usually ask such staff authority from the board before taking the offer), and I even heard that CEO make most M&A decision in Manufacture industry. So little by little, not vital yet significant decisions accumulate to the final chip of CEO against the fundamental interest of shareholders. You may wonder why CEO gets so much authority, why the boards refuse to take charge of the whole firm. In modern firms, CEO is valuable asset for its expertise in running so complicated modern firm institution. Multinational firms got a huge balance sheet with intricate operation procedure, culture divergence and governance inability, board members count on the expertise of CEO to arrange for all those mess. In some perspective, the only right of shareholders is the decision to fire or not to fire a CEO.

Another story believes that CEO got influence onto board members. When summoning a conference between board members, the CEO get most inside and crucial information of the firm and other members believe she does. Then CEO may influence the decision of other members, by such advantage.

Finally, I have to say Liam McGee departs BOA, just because he did a really sucking job, and no more reasons.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
jg-xs1
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-31 18:42