楼主: zhushiyou
2230 3

[宏观经济指标] Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 11粉丝

教授VIP

学科带头人

36%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
848098 个
通用积分
154.8601
学术水平
27 点
热心指数
34 点
信用等级
18 点
经验
24374 点
帖子
1114
精华
3
在线时间
716 小时
注册时间
2006-8-5
最后登录
2018-1-26

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO

Publisher: Zed Books
Number Of Pages: 256
Publication Date: 2003-11-29
Sales Rank: 271914
ISBN / ASIN: 184277073X
EAN: 9781842770733
Binding: Paperback
Manufacturer: Zed Books
Studio: Zed Books
Average Rating: 4


Our lives are all affected by three hugely powerful and well financed, but undemocratic, organizations: the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization. These institutions share a common ideology. They aggressively promote "corporate" capitalism, neoliberalism, giving free rein to the interests of a small number of transnational corporations. This book presents the history and fundamental ideas of this economic ideology. Describing each member of the "unholy trinity," it shows how neoliberalism hijacked the IMF, World Bank and WTO in relation to their global financial, development and trade management roles.

Review:

Whose Hitler?

In a word, if you like living in a sovereign nation, then write your Congressional representive, your Senators, and have the US removed from these organizations. There is a real bad element here. World domination bad.


Review:

good class action

This is what university work should be like: a professor leading a group of studnets in common action and collectieley publishing their work. Well done. Lots of good points which the unholy trinity should answer in some forum or other. All three organs are dominated by the US as Stiglitz, Bellamy and others have pointed out. Whether US hegemony is a good or bad thing is a different question.
I felt the book could have done without Foucault, who has little to contribute on the parameters of discourse or much else. The fact is the budgets of these institutions dwarf all others and it makes a welcome change to see an articulate counter point of view, especially as it was a grassroots student project. Definitely worth a read.

Review:

good overview of the IMF, World Bank & WTO

Any one looking for a good, critical overview of the history of the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization--the major institutions of international economic governance, the institutional guardians and promoters of neoliberal globalization--should check this book out. It reviews the history of these three organizations in depth. Most analyses of these organizations that I've seen just look at their current policies and critique them. Peet (and the junior student authors who assisted him) add a great deal of historical depth to this, looking at the conditions under which the unhol trinity were founded at the end of World War II, how their missions have changed over time, and the power structures in which these organizations are embedded and part of. He looks at how the changing ways the US government has used these organizations to advance the interests of the US political-economic elite (what Peet et al. call the Washington-Wall Street Alliance) on the world stage. This book also provides a progressive critique of their impact, although other sources probably go into deeper depth on that score. Since Peet is a social scientist, he doesn't just put the problem down to bad intentions, but down to bad social structures--a refreshing change from some of the simple-minded demonization of the elite you can find in some quarters. Peet particularly analyzes how the role of people's beliefs in shaping their actions within these institutions. In some ways, this is the weakest part of the book. He tries to use an analysis of discourse a la Foucault to explain the working of these organizations, explaining how the hegemony of neoclassical economics shuts out any debates of alternatives. While this is valuable, discourse analysis along can not bear the full weight of analyzing the problems with the unholy trinity--you need some sort of political-economic analysis in the lines of world-systems theory or something to make full sense of these organizations. Indeed, Peet lays out his Foucauldian analysis in the first chapter--and then those ideas barely show up again. Honestly, I would suggest anyone who's not an academic just skip the first chapter and read the rest of the book. You won't miss much. After the first chapter though, the book provides a solid overview of the history of the IMF, World Bank and WTO--and through them much of the process of globalization.

130462.pdf (21.9 MB, 需要: 30 个论坛币)
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:World Bank Trinity World Bank Holy IMF The WTO Bank Trinity

沙发
shawyuan 发表于 2013-4-2 20:05:51 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
有点儿贵啊,买不起,攒钱切

使用道具

藤椅
donnyma 发表于 2018-11-14 16:33:53 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
书的质量太差,还30个币,能退吗?

使用道具

板凳
jasonnetis 发表于 2020-2-18 00:21:49 来自手机 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
donnyma 发表于 2018-11-14 16:33
书的质量太差,还30个币,能退吗?
您好 可以帮我[研究报告]Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO 发给我吗?钱不够呢。谢谢啦

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 04:51