楼主: zhushiyou
1705 0

[宏观经济指标] Action Science [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 11粉丝

教授VIP

学科带头人

36%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
848098 个
通用积分
154.8601
学术水平
27 点
热心指数
34 点
信用等级
18 点
经验
24374 点
帖子
1114
精华
3
在线时间
716 小时
注册时间
2006-8-5
最后登录
2018-1-26

相似文件 换一批

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
130731.pdf (23.6 MB, 需要: 30 个论坛币) <BR>
<P><FONT color=#800080>Action Science (Jossey Bass Business and Management Series) </FONT></P>
<P>By Chris Argyris, Robert Putnam, Diana McLain Smith,</P>
<P>Publisher:   Jossey-Bass, Inc.<BR>Number Of Pages:   510<BR>Publication Date:   1985-12<BR>Sales Rank:   872626<BR>ISBN / ASIN:   0875896650<BR>EAN:   9780875896656<BR>Binding:   Hardcover<BR>Manufacturer:   Jossey-Bass, Inc.<BR>Studio:   Jossey-Bass, Inc.<BR>Average Rating:   5</P>
<P>Review:</P>
<P>Definitely tough...and more than definitely worth the time.</P>
<P>Action Science (1985) is the result of a collaborative project by Chris Argyris, Robert Putnam and Diana McLain Smith. The authors' main objective was to produce a body of knowledge that would bridge the concepts between theory and practice, thought and action and science and common sense (Argyris, Putnam, and McLain Smith, p.1). The authors' collective experience and expertise establishes them as credible, competent and well versed in the field of leadership. I am convinced that as a group of professionals they are uniquely qualified to comment on the concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention.Embedded in the text of this work is a tremendous amount of information that is documented and supported by research and established theories. I believe the authors did achieve what they set out to do and ended with a useable, comprehensive, and valid body of knowledge. The information presented in the tables and figures offers clarity and visual reference for data that may otherwise be confusing and frustrating. <BR>Argyris and Schon in Educating the Reflective Practioner (1974) state, "All human beings - not only professional practitioners - need to become competent in taking action and simultaneously reflecting on this action to learn from it." In the process of doing this review, I became engaged in an exercise of self-reflection. I began the task of defining my professional behavior and can sum up my experience by asking what is it that I am doing, why I am doing it, how am I doing it and what I could do different to grow and learn. Finally, I would like to highlight passages that caused me to reflect on my professional practice and development. <BR>1. The concept of double loop learning makes sense and is something I am going to attempt to increase my awareness level.<BR>2. The explanation of espoused theory versus theory-in use conveys a level of unawareness (on the part of most professionals) concerning what they do in contrast to what they think or say they do. <BR>3. Barriers that inhibit our learning are self erected coping mechanisms that may serve a purpose but they are not strategies that will help us grow or learn professionally.<BR>One assertion explored in the text is that by identifying the barriers that exist in our communities of inquiry we might be more prepared to overcome these barriers (Argyris et al. p.89). By defining our barriers we become better equipped to overcome these barriers. In reading Action Science I engaged in a professional exercise of reflective thought. On every page there is material, concepts and theories that are worthy of reflection. I found myself engaged in reflective thought and self-discovery throughout the reading of this text.</P>
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Science Action SCIE ACT CTI Business Series Robert result Chris

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-28 04:28