:用面板数据做了probit模型的回归后,再求解边际影响,发现结果与做回归时的系数一样,我哪方面出问题了?

如下:
. xtprobit bi_tfpch disaster dum, re
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bi_tfpch | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
disaster | -.7250742 1.137158 -0.64 0.524 -2.953862 1.503714
dum | -.709501 .294082 -2.41 0.016 -1.285891 -.1331108
_cons | .4200261 .2439341 1.72 0.085 -.0580759 .8981281
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
/lnsig2u | -16.5809 65.83899 -145.6229 112.4611
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | .0002509 .0082596 2.39e-32 2.63e+24
rho | 6.30e-08 4.14e-06 5.71e-64 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. mfx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
variable | dy/dx Std. Err. z P>|z| [ 95% C.I. ] X
---------+--------------------------------------------------------------------
disaster | -.7250742 1.13716 -0.64 0.524 -2.95386 1.50371 .143909
dum*| -.709501 .29408 -2.41 0.016 -1.28589 -.133111 .4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
从上可以发现,disasater和dum的回归系数与它们的dy/dx值是一致的,这正确吗?还是说我用mfx求面板数据probit回归的边际影响是错的?



雷达卡







京公网安备 11010802022788号







