楼主: 垄断利润464
299 0

[英文文献] A Comparison of Anti-Doping Measures in Sporting Contests-体育竞赛中反兴奋剂措施的比较 [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

等待验证会员

学前班

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
0 个
通用积分
0
学术水平
0 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
10 点
帖子
0
精华
0
在线时间
0 小时
注册时间
2020-9-19
最后登录
2020-9-19

楼主
垄断利润464 发表于 2005-5-29 18:08:50 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
英文文献:A Comparison of Anti-Doping Measures in Sporting Contests-体育竞赛中反兴奋剂措施的比较
英文文献作者:Qin Wu,Raph C-Bayer,Liam Lenten
英文文献摘要:
This paper proposes a new anti-doping policy. In a conditional superannuation scheme athletes have to pay a certain fraction of their season income from sports into a superannuation fund from which they can only draw if they have never been caught doping. Theoretically, this fund has two important advantages over conventional anti-doping policies such as bans and fines. It does not lose its deterrence effect when athletes get near the end of their careers such as in the case of bans and it can deal with the widespread problem that drug cheats are often only found out much later when the detection technology has caught up with doping practices. We build a model of a dynamic sporting contest, implement it in the laboratory, and compare the performance of our policy to that of traditional policies. Our policy compares favorably with respect to doping prevention without reducing the quality of competition more than other measures do.

本文提出了一种新的反兴奋剂政策。在一项有条件的退休金计划中,运动员必须将赛季收入的一定比例投入退休金基金,只有在从未被发现服用兴奋剂的情况下,他们才能从中提取。从理论上讲,与传统的反兴奋剂政策相比,这项基金有两个重要的优势,比如禁令和罚款。它没有失去威慑效应当运动员职业生涯快结束时,如在禁令和它可以处理广泛的问题,药物作弊往往只有发现多了后,检测技术已经赶上了掺杂实践。我们建立一个动态体育竞赛的模型,在实验室中实施,并比较我们的政策与传统政策的表现。在不降低比赛质量的情况下,我们的政策比其他措施更有利。
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
扫码
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2026-1-29 13:36