发帖
雷达卡
介绍：
The Science of Scientific Writing
George D. Gopen and Judith A. Swan
American Scientist, Volume 78
If the reader is to grasp what the writer means, the writer must understand what the reader needs.Science is often hard to read. Most people assume that its difficulties are born out of necessity out of the extreme complexity of scientific concepts, data and analysis. We argue here that complexity of thought need not lead to impenetrability of expression; we demonstrate a number of rhetorical principles that can produce clarity in communication without oversimplifying scientific issues. The results are substantive, not merely cosmetic: Improving the quality of writing actually improves the quality of thought. The fundamental purpose of scientific discourse is not the mere presentation of information and thought, but rather its actual communication. It does not matter how pleased an author might be to have converted all the right data into sentences and paragraphs; it matters only whether a large majority of the reading audience accurately perceives what the author had in mind. Therefore, in order to understand how best to improve writing, we would do well to understand better how readers go about reading. Such an understanding has recently become available through work done in the fields of rhetoric, linguistics and cognitive psychology. It has helped to produce a methodology based on the concept of reader expectations.
Writing with the Reader in Mind: Expectation and Context
京公网安备 11010802022788号
