楼主: lxlbluescream
1973 1

求帮忙解决三道公司理财题目,每题20论坛币 [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 2粉丝

本科生

1%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
13616 个
通用积分
0.0668
学术水平
2 点
热心指数
0 点
信用等级
0 点
经验
3544 点
帖子
42
精华
0
在线时间
63 小时
注册时间
2012-12-6
最后登录
2022-6-15

20论坛币
复制下来有点乱码,可以直接二楼的pdf                                                                                                                                       



                                           
  •                                                         Consider a firm which is initially 100 percent owned by a manager. The manager’swealth, [size=11.000000pt]W , consists only of the market value of the firm’s equity. The total amount ofthe firm’s resources is $1 million. The manager will use some of the firm’s resourcesfor his/her own perquisite consumption, [size=11.000000pt]F, which is completely unproductive. Thatis, $1 perquisite consumption by the manager would result in $1 reduction in the firmvalue. The manager has a utility function, [size=11.000000pt]U ([size=11.000000pt]F, W ), which is increasing and concavein both [size=11.000000pt]F and [size=11.000000pt]W. The manager’s utility function is publicly known, but his/herperquisite consumption is unobservable by others.
    (a)  Show graphically and explain in words how the owner-manager optimally chooseshis/her perquisite consumption.
    (b)  Now, the owner-manager wants to reduce his/her ownership of the firm from100% to 51%. The manager thus sells 49% of the firm’s shares to new sharehold-ers who are willing to purchase the shares as long as they expect to break-even atthe zero riskless rate of interest. Show that if the new shareholders naively con-jecture that the owner-manager remains to consume the same amount of perksas that characterized in part (a) and price the shares accordingly, they will suffera loss.
    (c)  Who would bear the agency costs of outside equity? Why?


    2.Suppose that a firm has assets in place which generate $100 million in good stateand $50 million in bad state, where either state is equally likely to occur. The firmhas outstanding debt with promised payments of $50 million. An investment project,which requires $10 million and yields a risky cash flow of $11 million in the good stateand zero in the bad state, is now available to the firm. Suppose that the existing debthas no covenant restricting the firm to issue senior debt to raise additional funds.Assume zero riskless rate of interest and universal risk neutrality.
    (a)  If the firm has to issue equity to existing shareholders, would the firm optimallychoose to undertake the project given that its objective is to maximize share-holders’ wealth? Why?
    (b)  If the firm has to issue debt junior than the existing debt, would the firm op-timally choose to undertake the project given that its objective is to maximizeshareholders’ wealth? Why?
                                                    
                                                                                                    (c) If the firm has to issue debt with the same seniority as the existing debt, wouldthe firm optimally choose to undertake the project given that its objective is tomaximize shareholders’ wealth? Why?
                                            (d) If the firm has to issue debt senior than the existing debt, would the firm op-timally choose to undertake the project given that its objective is to maximizeshareholders’ wealth? Why?
                                           

    3. Consider a firm that investors believe is one of two types, good or bad, with equalprobability. Information is asymmetric in that managers of the firm know with cer-tainty the true type of the firm. The firm has access to a project which requires animmediate investment of $1 million. The objective of the managers is to maximizethe intrinsic value of the existing shareholders’ claims. The cash flow distribution ofthe firm, contingent on its investment decision and type, are presented below:
                                    
                            
                                                                                                                                                               Good                          Bad
    Asset-in-place           $1.25 million             $1 million
                                            Project                       $1.2 million               $1.1 million


                                    
                            
                                                                                                                                                    Suppose that all agents are risk neutral (i.e., they only care about expected value)and the riskless rate of interest is 5%. If the firm is limited to equity financing, shouldit go ahead with the project? Why?
                                
                        
               

关键词:20论坛币 公司理财 0论坛币 论坛币 求帮忙 公司理财
沙发
lxlbluescream 在职认证  发表于 2013-11-27 10:29:38 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
复制下来有点乱码,可以看这里的pdf

2013fa5.pdf

21.42 KB

题目

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-8 01:00