楼主: jjyyg1
1082 2

[其它] Markowitz 获诺贝尔奖时说的一句话,是什么意思? [推广有奖]

  • 5关注
  • 0粉丝

讲师

26%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
77 个
通用积分
9.5659
学术水平
3 点
热心指数
1 点
信用等级
2 点
经验
10666 点
帖子
348
精华
0
在线时间
205 小时
注册时间
2008-1-10
最后登录
2024-5-19

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Finally, I would like to add a comment concerning portfolio theoryas a part of the microeconomics of action under uncertainty. It has not alwaysbeen considered so.这句话怎么翻译呢,谢谢了。

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Markowitz 是什么意思 诺贝尔奖 Mark 诺贝尔 诺贝尔奖

沙发
luluxiyue 发表于 2014-3-6 23:47:54 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
将资产组合理论看成微观经济学中不确定性行为理论的一部分。

使用道具

藤椅
karleenchan 发表于 2014-3-6 23:52:46 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
你的是imcomplete paragraph 看整段吧! 你便會懂了.

"Finally, I would like to add a comment concerning portfolio theory as a part of the microeconomics of action under uncertainty.  It has not always been considered so.  For example, when I defended my dissertation as a student in the Economics Department of the University of Chicago, Professor Milton Friedman argued that portfolio theory was not Economics, and that they could not award me a Ph.D. degree in Economics for a dissertation which was not in Economics.  I assume that he was only half serious, since they did award me the degree without long debate.  As to the merits of his arguments, at this point I am quite willing to concede: at the time I defended my dissertation, portfolio theory was not part of Economics. But now it is."

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-5-21 19:55