文献研读2(2): Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs?

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

第二个主题：聚集经济

第2 篇文章：Beaudry Catherine, and SchiffauerovaAndrea. Who’s right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanizationdebate [J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38,318-337.

看点：如果说上一篇文献，对聚集经济研究的估计方法、问题进行了总结的话，这篇文献则是对聚集经济的内容做了系统的总结。

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏0 回帖

关键词：Marshall Marsha Jacobs Jacob Shall versus 主题 文章

一篇简单的写 基础要素与聚集经济，哪个重要及其关系的文章

Krugman,P. (2005) Second winds for industrial regions. In D. Coyle, W. Alexander, B.Ashcroft (eds) New Wealth for Old Regions: Scotland’s Economic Prospects, pp.35–47. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

一些重要的语句

Sothe stakes are higher when factor mobility is high. The potential role forpolicy is also considerably enlarged. When factor mobility is low, thedifference between policies that raise TFP bya few percent and policies that lower it bya few percent is, guess what, a few percent. When factor mobility is high, such policy differences can bemake or break for regional development.

Externaleconomies are probably a secondary issue for the growth of large nationaleconomies, but for regional economies they can be decisive one way or theother.

一个看点：

Krugman讲了很多美国的故事。比如北卡三角的崛起等等。

Theresearch triangle in North Carolina is an example of the creation of ahigh-tech complex in a previously unexpected area, which also relies a lot onhigher education. So, if you should happen to have a strong tradition of highereducation, as Scotland does is certainly something to build on.