楼主: ReneeBK
2240 1

[问答] Should you drop interaction terms if they’re not significant? [推广有奖]

  • 1关注
  • 62粉丝

VIP

已卖:4897份资源

学术权威

14%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

TA的文库  其他...

R资源总汇

Panel Data Analysis

Experimental Design

威望
1
论坛币
49635 个
通用积分
55.6937
学术水平
370 点
热心指数
273 点
信用等级
335 点
经验
57805 点
帖子
4005
精华
21
在线时间
582 小时
注册时间
2005-5-8
最后登录
2023-11-26

楼主
ReneeBK 发表于 2014-4-15 00:26:14 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

In an ANOVA, adding interaction terms still leaves the main effects as main effects.  That is, as long as the data are balanced, the main effects and the interactions are independent.  The main effect is still telling you if there is an overall effect of that variable, after accounting for other variables in the model.

But in regression, adding interaction terms makes the coefficients of the lower order terms conditional effects, not main effects.  That means that the effect of one predictor is conditional on the value of the other.  The coefficient of the lower order term isn’t the effect of that term.  It’s the effect only when the other term in the interaction equals 0.

So if an interaction isn’t significant, should you drop it?

If you are just checking for the presence of an interaction to make sure you are specifying the model correctly, go ahead and drop it.  The interaction uses up df and changes the meaning of the lower order coefficients, and complicates the model.  So if you were just checking for it, drop it.

But if you actually hypothesized an interaction that wasn’t significant, leave it in the model.  The insignificant interaction means something in this case–it helps you evaluate your hypothesis.  Taking it out can do more damage in specification error than in will in the loss of df.

The same is true in ANOVA models.

And as always, leave in any lower order terms, significant or not, for any higher order terms in the model.  That means you have to leave in all insignificant two-way interactions for any significant 3-ways.


二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:significant interaction interact Action Should terms should

沙发
bakoll 发表于 2015-1-21 22:59:01
个人观点,交互项不显著,还有什么理由保留呢,正可以简化模型

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注cda
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-30 11:29