- Should I be using genlinmixed and specifying clinic as random effect, as follows (for looking at race/ethnicity (nominal) and test result? Or should i be using a different procedure?
/DATA_STRUCTURE SUBJECTS=clinic*patientID
/FIELDS TARGET=testresult TRIALS=NONE OFFSET=NONE
/TARGET_OPTIONS DISTRIBUTION=BINOMIAL LINK=LOGIT
/FIXED EFFECTS= racethnicity USE_INTERCEPT=TRUE
/RANDOM USE_INTERCEPT=TRUE SUBJECTS=clinic
COVARIANCE_TYPE=VARIANCE_COMPONENTS
/BUILD_OPTIONS TARGET_CATEGORY_ORDER=DESCENDING
INPUTS_CATEGORY_ORDER=DESCENDING
MAX_ITERATIONS=100 CONFIDENCE_LEVEL=95 DF_METHOD=RESIDUAL COVB= MODEL
/EMMEANS_OPTIONS SCALE=ORIGINAL PADJUST=LSD.
- The 2nd question. The data set and analysis is actually a bit more complicated. This is a multilevel analysis where, besides patient level measures, I have some clinic characteristics as well as some areal measures for each patient based on their residence's zip code. So when doing bivariate analyses to assess impact of patient or clinic-level characteristics I have included a random effect for clinic. When looking at areal (SES, pop density etc.) measures in bivariate analyses I have used ZIPcode as the random effect. I believe this is the correct way to go (but welcome feedback). But, now that I want to do multivariate runs looking at individual, clinic and areal predictors I do not see how I can include 2 random effect measures (clinic and zip) using genlinmixed. Should I be using a different spss procedure or what am I missing in terms of syntax within genlinmixed?


雷达卡



京公网安备 11010802022788号







