楼主: remlus
1809 0

[其他] 一个有趣的逻辑悖论 [推广有奖]

版主

已卖:151份资源

学术权威

25%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
1
论坛币
23189 个
通用积分
139.7692
学术水平
616 点
热心指数
655 点
信用等级
463 点
经验
129120 点
帖子
4591
精华
0
在线时间
6417 小时
注册时间
2005-3-14
最后登录
2025-12-10

初级热心勋章 初级学术勋章 中级热心勋章

楼主
remlus 发表于 2008-5-15 02:50:00 |AI写论文

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币

Furthermore, applications of option pricing formulas to trading activities seem to suffer a
strange inconsistency. We imagine that the stock and bond are perfectly priced and perfectly
liquid – available for perfect hedging. Then, we search for options that are priced incorrectly
as trading opportunities. If the options can be priced wrong, why can’t the stock and bond
be priced wrong? We should treat all assets symmetrically in evaluating trading opportunities.
Trading opportunities also involve risk, and a theory that pretends they are arbitrage
opportunities does not help much to quantify that risk.

cochrane    asset pricing

大家怎么看呢

二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Applications Application Consistency Evaluating Activities 逻辑

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加好友,备注jr
拉您进交流群
GMT+8, 2025-12-25 12:34