央行应该把零通货膨胀作为目标吗

是 否 +2 论坛币

k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群

赵安豆老师微信：zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

立即领取

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币！

+2 论坛币

<P>欢迎大家踊跃讨论</P>

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明：姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格，未注明则拒绝

分享0 收藏1 回帖

关键词：通货膨胀

呵呵，通货膨胀率在3%以内应该算正常。

零通胀?有必要吗?不实际的问题,没必要论

从实践来看，这个目标是难以实现的。想ECB这样的把“保持物价水平稳定”作为单一货币政策目标的经济体也仅仅让其物价水平保持在2％左右，其他经济体就可想而知了。其实，我们也没有必要把零通胀作为目标，因为轻微的通胀被认为是有益的。

绝对不应该! 就像 现在的美国 通货膨胀可以刺激消费 GDP会增加 政府业绩更多的是用GDP来衡量 这是一个硬指标 虽然忽略了许多 其他因素

应该作为目标之一

建立了完善的保障体系的情况下，高通货膨胀更有益于中国经济！！！！！！！！！

Have you learned the squared Loss function of central bank, it is just a trade off between output target and inflation.

The best solution is not possible , zero inflation but also zero output growth, stational or stagnation.

Then people try to get the second best solution, a little inflation and also a little output growth, but it should let the utility from growth greater than loss of the confidence of market.And it is also not possible, because the market will not be always fooled by the central bank. They adjust their inflation expectation at next period automatically. It is a process without end, then the second best solution is also not possible

The third best solution, that means the president of central bank weights inflation bigger than government, to reduce the inflationsbias.

I think it is quite useful to derive these squared loss function.

For your reference